首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation and application of a prognostic model for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy
【2h】

Validation and application of a prognostic model for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy

机译:高级胰腺癌接受姑息化疗患者预后模型的验证与应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background We previously developed a robust prognostic model (GS model) to predict the survival outcome of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) receiving palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S‐1 (GS). This study aimed to validate the application of the GS model in APC patients receiving chemotherapy other than the GS regimen. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed 727 APC patients who received first‐line palliative chemotherapy other than the GS regimen between 2010 and 2016 at four institutions in Taiwan. The patients were categorized into three prognostic groups based on the GS model for comparisons of survival outcome, best tumor response, and in‐group survival differences with monotherapy or combination therapy. Results The median survival times for the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 13.4, 8.4, and 4.6 months, respectively. The hazard ratios for the comparisons of intermediate and poor to good prognostic groups were 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]), 1.22‐1.88, P < .001) and 2.84 (95% CI, 2.34‐3.45, P < .001). The best tumor responses with either partial response or stable disease were 57.5%, 40.4%, and 17.2% of patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups (P < .001), respectively. For patients in the good prognostic group, first‐line chemotherapy with monotherapy and combination therapy had similar median survival times (13.8 vs 12.9 months, P = .26), while combination therapy showed a better median survival time than monotherapy in patients in the intermediate and poor prognostic groups (8.5 vs 8.0 months, P = .038 and 5.7 vs 3.7 months, P = .001, respectively). Conclusion The results of our study supported the application of the GS model as a general prognostic tool for patients with pancreatic cancer receiving first‐line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine‐based regimens.
机译:摘要背景我们以前开发了一种稳健的预后模型(GS模型),以预测具有吉西他滨加S-1(GS)的姑息治疗的晚期胰腺癌(APC)患者的存活结果。本研究旨在验证GS模型在接受除GS方案以外的化疗的APC患者中的应用。患者和方法我们回顾性地分析了727名APC患者,这些患者在台湾四个机构的2010年和2016年间GS方案以外获得了一线姑息治疗。基于GS模型分为三种预后基团,以进行生存结果,最佳肿瘤反应和单一疗法或联合治疗的群体存活差异的GS模型。结果良好,中间和差的预后组的中位存活时间分别为13.4,8.4和4.6个月。中间体和差与良好预后基团比较的危险比为1.51(95%置信区间[CI]),1.22-1.88,P <.001)和2.84(95%CI,2.34-3.45,P <.001 )。良好,中间体和差的预后组(P <0.001)分别为部分反应或稳定疾病的最佳肿瘤反应分别为57.5%,40.4%和17.2%的患者(p <.001)。对于良好的预后群体,单药治疗和联合治疗的一线化疗具有相似的中值存活时间(13.8 vs 12.9个月,P = .26),而组合治疗表现出比中间患者的单一疗法更好的中位数生存时间差的预后群体(8.5 Vs 8.0个月,P = .038和5.7与3.7个月,P = .001)。结论我们研究的结果支持GS模型作为胰腺癌患者接受吉西他滨的方案的胰腺癌患者的一般预后工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号