首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study
【2h】

The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study

机译:性别和学业成就对侵犯医学系学生学术诚信的影响,描述性横断面调查研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of medical faculty students about violations of academic integrity. Method From the whole population of the 572 students of the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, 271 students participated voluntarily in a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Descriptive data were recorded in the survey and a five-point Likert-type instrument, namely the Tendency towards Academic Dishonesty Scale, was used as the data collection tool in the study. The scale included 22 items’ means that are considered to evaluate “Tendency towards academic dishonesty” (TTAD) score. In addition, four subscales, namely “Tendency towards cheating”, “Dishonesty in works such as assignments and projects”, “Tendency towards dishonesty in research and reporting processes” and “Tendency towards citation dishonesty” scores were evaluated separately. Results Of the participants, 138 (53.3%) were male. TTAD scores were 2.15 ± 0.61, showing a slight tendency towards academic dishonesty, according to the scale. TTAD scores and standard deviations (SD) were 2.26 ± 0.65 and 2.04 ± 0.55 for men and women, respectively (P = 0.005). There was no difference in the TTAD scores for students whether they had read the ethics code. Significant differences were observed in the TTAD scores for students with gender, different academic achievements and in different academic years. However, when multivariate analysis was performed, the significance shown in the results disappeared. Conclusion In our study, a slight tendency to academic dishonesty was found for medical faculty students and there were no differences between all of the recorded individual factors of students.
机译:摘要目的本研究的目的是确定医学院学生对侵犯学术诚信的特点。来自572名学生的全人口的方法,MuğlaSıtkıKoçman大学医学院,271名学生在描述性横断面调查中自愿参加。在调查中记录了描述性数据,并且五分李克特型仪器,即学术不诚实规模的趋势被用作研究中的数据收集工具。规模包括22项“意味着被认为评估”倾向于学术不诚实“(TTAD)得分。此外,另外四个分量,即“作弊的倾向”,“在作业和项目等方面的不诚实”,“研究和报告过程中的不诚实倾向”和“引发不诚实倾向”评分分别评估。参与者的结果,138(53.3%)是男性。根据规模,TTAD得分为2.15±0.61,表现出对学术不诚实的略有趋势。 TTAD评分和标准偏差(SD)分别为男性和女性2.26±0.65和2.04±0.55(P = 0.005)。对于学生的TTAD分数没有差异,他们是否阅读道德代码。在具有性别,不同学术成就和不同学年的学生的TTAD分数中观察到显着差异。然而,当进行多变量分析时,结果中显示的意义消失了。结论在我们的研究中,为医学教师学生发现了略微倾向于学术不诚实,所有记录的学生的个人因素都没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号