首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study
【24h】

The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study

机译:描述性横断面调查研究显示,性别和学业成就对违反医学博士学位的学生的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of medical faculty students about violations of academic integrity. From the whole population of the 572 students of the Mu?la S?tk? Ko?man University Faculty of Medicine, 271 students participated voluntarily in a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Descriptive data were recorded in the survey and a five-point Likert-type instrument, namely the Tendency towards Academic Dishonesty Scale, was used as the data collection tool in the study. The scale included 22 items’ means that are considered to evaluate “Tendency towards academic dishonesty” (TTAD) score. In addition, four subscales, namely “Tendency towards cheating”, “Dishonesty in works such as assignments and projects”, “Tendency towards dishonesty in research and reporting processes” and “Tendency towards citation dishonesty” scores were evaluated separately. Of the participants, 138 (53.3%) were male. TTAD scores were 2.15?±?0.61, showing a slight tendency towards academic dishonesty, according to the scale. TTAD scores and standard deviations (SD) were 2.26?±?0.65 and 2.04?±?0.55 for men and women, respectively (P?=?0.005). There was no difference in the TTAD scores for students whether they had read the ethics code. Significant differences were observed in the TTAD scores for students with gender, different academic achievements and in different academic years. However, when multivariate analysis was performed, the significance shown in the results disappeared. In our study, a slight tendency to academic dishonesty was found for medical faculty students and there were no differences between all of the recorded individual factors of students.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定医学系学生违反学术诚信的特征。从572名Mu?la S?tk?学生的全部人口中高曼大学医学院有271名学生自愿参加了描述性横断面调查。描述性数据记录在调查中,五点李克特型工具,即“学术不诚实倾向量表”,用作研究的数据收集工具。该量表包括22个项目,意味着被认为是评估“学术不诚实倾向”(TTAD)得分。此外,还分别评估了四个子量表,即“作弊倾向”,“作业和项目等作品中的不诚实”,“研究和报告过程中的不诚实倾向”和“引证不诚实倾向”得分。在参与者中,有138位(53.3%)是男性。根据量表,TTAD得分为2.15±0.61,显示出学术不诚实的轻微趋势。男性和女性的TTAD得分和标准差(SD)分别为2.26±0.65和2.04±0.55(P = 0.005)。无论学生是否阅读了道德守则,TTAD分数都没有差异。性别,学习成绩和学习年限不同的学生在TTAD评分中观察到显着差异。但是,进行多元分析时,结果所示的重要性消失了。在我们的研究中,医学系学生发现学术不诚实的趋势很小,并且所有记录的学生个人因素之间没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号