首页> 外文OA文献 >The Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards Eligibility Decision-Making Process
【2h】

The Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards Eligibility Decision-Making Process

机译:基于替代成就标准资格决策过程的替代评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), students with significant intellectual disabilities (ID) are allowed to take alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) in lieu of the standardized assessments taken by their peers, however evidence suggests that IEP teams inconsistently and sometimes inaccurately apply established participation criteria in finding students eligible to participate in AA-AAS. The purpose of this generic qualitative study was to describe the decision-making process used by Individual Education Program (IEP) teams to identify students eligible to participate in AA-AAS. Thirteen case managers of students taking the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) from central Virginia participated in in-depth interviews. The findings resulted in the Influences on the Process of AA-AAS Eligibility Decisions (IPAED) Model describing a three-phased eligibility decision-making process. Implications suggest the need for training for all IEP team members, with a particular focus on parent education and involvement.
机译:在“不让任何一个孩子落后”(NCLB)下,允许具有严重智力障碍(ID)的学生根据替代成就标准(AA-AAS)进行替代评估,以代替同伴进行的标准化评估,但是证据表明IEP团队在确定有资格参加AA-AAS的学生中,不一致地,有时不正确地应用既定的参加标准。这项一般性定性研究的目的是描述个人教育计划(IEP)团队用来确定有资格参加AA-AAS的学生的决策过程。参加弗吉尼亚州中部弗吉尼亚替代评估计划(VAAP)的13名学生的案件经理参加了深度访谈。这些发现导致了对AA-AAS资格决策(IPAED)模型过程的影响,该模型描述了一个三阶段的资格决策过程。这意味着需要对所有IEP团队成员进行培训,尤其要关注家长的教育和参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号