首页> 外文OA文献 >Thermal Intravesical Chemotherapy Reduce Recurrence Rate for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Thermal Intravesical Chemotherapy Reduce Recurrence Rate for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

机译:热膀胱内化疗减少非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌患者的复发率:META分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer accounts for nearly 80% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases, which often recur and progress. This meta-analysis was evaluated by the adverse events and recurrence rate of thermal intravesical chemotherapy vs. normal temperature intravesical chemotherapy in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Methods: A systematic review and cumulative analysis of studies reporting adverse events and recurrence rate of thermal intravesical chemotherapy vs. normal temperature intravesical chemotherapy was performed through a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochranelibrary.com, CNKI, Wanfang Med Online database and VIP database. All analyses were performed using the Revman manager 5.Result: Twelve studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 1 retrospective study) including 888 patients, 445 in the thermal intravesical chemotherapy group, and 443 in the normal temperature intravesical chemotherapy group, met the eligibility criteria. Patients in the thermal intravesical chemotherapy group had a lower risk of disease recurrence than those who had normal temperature intravesical chemotherapy (24 months follow-up group: RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21–0.43, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%; 36 months follow-up group: RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14–0.54, P = 0.0002, I2 = 0%) while no significant difference in adverse events rate (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.53–1.52; P = 0.67, I2 = 78%).Conclusions: When compared with normal temperature intravesical chemotherapy, thermal intravesical chemotherapy can reduce the recurrence rate without increasing incidence of adverse events in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
机译:背景:非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌占新诊断患者癌症病例的近80%,这通常会发生重现和进展。该荟萃分析是通过热膀胱内化疗的不良事件和复发率与常温膀胱癌治疗的不良事件和复发率评估。方法:对报告不良事件和复发率的研究和累积分析通过综合搜索PubMed,Embase,Cochranelibrary.com,CNKI,WANFANG MED在线数据库和VIP数据库来进行热膀胱内化疗与常温介质化疗。所有分析都是使用Revman Manager 5.Result:12个研究(11个随机对照试验和1次回顾性研究),包括888名患者,在热膀胱内化疗组中445例,443次在常温膀胱内化疗组中,达到了资格标准。热膀胱内化疗组中的患者的疾病复发风险较低,那些具有正常温度的膀胱内疗(24个月后续组:RR = 0.30,95%CI:0.21-0.43,P <0.00001,I2 = 0% ; 36个月后续组:RR = 0.27,95%CI:0.14-0.54,P = 0.0002,I2 = 0%,而不良事件率没有显着差异(RR = 0.89,95%CI = 0.53-1.52; P = 0.67,I2 = 78%)。结论:与常温膀胱内化疗相比,热膀胱内化疗可以降低复发率,而不会增加非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌患者的不良事件发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号