首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Intravenous propafenone versus intravenous amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation of recent onset: a placebo-controlled study.
【24h】

Intravenous propafenone versus intravenous amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation of recent onset: a placebo-controlled study.

机译:静脉使用普罗帕酮与静脉注射胺碘酮治疗近期发作的房颤:安慰剂对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The efficacy and safety of intravenous propafenone, amiodarone, or placebo were compared in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset (duration < or = 48 hours). METHODS: 143 patients (77 men, mean age 63 +/- 12 years) were studied, of whom 46 received propafenone (2 mg/kg over 15 minutes followed by 10 mg/kg over the next 24 hours), 48 received amiodarone (300 mg intravenously over 1 hour, followed by 20 mg/kg over the next 24 hours, plus 1,800 mg/day orally, in 3 divided doses), and 49 received placebo (the equivalent amount of saline i.v. over 24 hours). Digoxin was administered to all patients who had not previously received it. RESULTS: Conversion to normal sinus rhythm occurred in 36 of 46 patients (78.2%) receiving propafenone, in 40 of 48 patients (83.3%) receiving amiodarone, and in 27 of the 49 (55.10%) controls (P < 0.02, drug vs placebo, between drugs NS). The mean time to conversion was 2 +/- 3 hours for propafenone, 7 +/- 5 hours for amiodarone, and 13 +/- 9 for placebo (P < 0.05). Patients who converted had smaller atria than those who did not (diameter: 42.7 +/- 5 vs 47.2 +/- 7 mm, P < 0.001 for all). Treatment was discontinued in one patient in the amiodarone group because of an allergic reaction and in two patients in the propafenone group because of excessive QRS widening. No side effects were observed in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Both drugs tested intravenously were equally effective and safe for the rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. However, propafenone offered the advantage of more rapid conversion than amiodarone.
机译:比较静脉注射普罗帕酮,胺碘酮或安慰剂在近期发作的心房纤颤(AF)(持续时间<或= 48小时)中的疗效和安全性。方法:研究了143例患者(77名男性,平均年龄63 +/- 12岁),其中46例接受普罗帕酮(15分钟内2 mg / kg,随后24小时内10 mg / kg),48例胺碘酮(在1小时内静脉注射300 mg,然后在接下来的24小时内以20 mg / kg的剂量服用,再以3次分装的剂量口服1,800 mg / day,49位接受安慰剂(24小时内静脉注射等量的生理盐水)。地高辛被施用于所有以前未接受过地高辛的患者。结果:接受普罗帕酮的46例患者中有36例(78.2%),接受胺碘酮的48例患者中有40例(83.3%)以及49例对照组中的27例(55.10%)发生了正常窦性心律的转变(P <0.02,药物与安慰剂,药物之间(NS)。普罗帕酮的平均转化时间为2 +/- 3小时,胺碘酮为7 +/- 5小时,安慰剂为13 +/- 9(P <0.05)。转换后的患者的心房小于未转换的患者(直径:42.7 +/- 5 vs 47.2 +/- 7 mm,所有P <0.001)。胺碘酮组中的一名患者因过敏反应而中止治疗,普罗帕酮组中的两名患者因QRS过度增宽而中止治疗。在安慰剂组中未观察到副作用。结论:两种静脉注射药物对于将新近发生的心房颤动快速转换为窦性心律均有效且安全。但是,普罗帕酮具有比胺碘酮更快转化的优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号