首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Intravenous administration of flecainide or propafenone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation does not predict adverse effects during 'pill-in-the-pocket' treatment
【24h】

Intravenous administration of flecainide or propafenone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation does not predict adverse effects during 'pill-in-the-pocket' treatment

机译:在近期发作的心房颤动患者中静脉注射氟卡尼或普罗帕酮不能预测“自用药”治疗期间的不良反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Pill-in-the-pocket treatment should be prescribed only if the administration of a loading oral dose of flecainide or propafenone has been proved safe in hospital, since major adverse effects have been reported in 5% of patients during in-hospital treatment. However, in emergency rooms, the oral administration of these drugs for the conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is very rarely used because it is time consuming. Objective To investigate whether tolerance to intravenous administration of flecainide or propafenone might predict the safety of pill-in-the-pocket treatment-the out-of-hospital self-administration of these drugs after the onset of palpitations-in patients with AF of recent onset.rnMethods One hundred and twenty-two patients with AF of recent onset who were successfully treated (conversion of AF within 2 h without major adverse effects) in hospital with intravenous flecainide or propafenone were discharged on pill-in-the-pocket treatment.rnResults During a mean follow-up of 11 ±4 months, 79 patients self-treated 213 arrhythmic episodes; treatment was successful in 201 episodes (94%). Major adverse events occurred in five patients (6%) and in four (5%) of these during the first oral treatment (one syncope, two presyncope, one sinus arrest). No patient reported symptoms attributable to bradyarrhythmia or hypotension during the self-treatment of arrhythmic recurrences when the first oral treatment was not accompanied by any major adverse effects. The study was prematurely terminated because of the high incidence of major adverse effects during the first out-of-hospital treatment. Conclusion The patient's tolerance of intravenous administration of flecainide or propafenone does not seem to predict adverse effects during out-of-hospital self-administration of these drugs.
机译:背景技术仅在医院证明已口服负荷剂量的氟卡尼或普罗帕酮是安全的时,才应开处方药,因为据报道5%的患者在院内治疗期间出现重大不良反应。但是,在急诊室中,很少使用这些药物来转化心房颤动(AF),因为这很费时间。目的探讨氟卡尼或普罗帕酮静脉注射的耐受性是否可预测自发性心绞痛发作后最近发生房颤患者的自用药治疗的安全性(院外自行服用)方法122例近期发作的房颤患者在医院接受静脉注射氟卡尼特或普罗帕酮的成功治疗(房颤在2小时内转换,无重大不良反应),接受了针灸治疗。结果平均随访11±4个月,有79例患者接受了213例心律失常的自我治疗。治疗成功了201次(94%)。在第一次口服治疗期间,有5名患者(6%)和其中的4名(5%)发生了重大不良事件(1例晕厥,2例晕厥,1例窦性停止)。当首次口服治疗未伴有任何重大不良反应时,没有患者报告在心律失常复发的自我治疗期间归因于心律失常或低血压的症状。由于首次院外治疗期间重大不良反应的发生率很高,因此该研究提前终止。结论患者对氟卡尼或普罗帕酮静脉给药的耐受性似乎不能预测这些药物在院外自我给药期间的不良反应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heart》 |2010年第7期|p.546-549|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Cento (FE) 44042, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, S Anna Hospital, Como, Italy;

    Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, S Anna Hospital, Como, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, Civil Hospital, Cento, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, S Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, Delta Hospital, Lagosanto, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, Civil Hospital, Sampierdarena, Italy;

    Division of Cardiology, S Anna Hospital, Como, Italy;

    Institute of Cardiology, Polytechnical University of Marche-Ancona, Torrette Hospital, Ancona, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:35:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号