首页> 外文期刊>Science education >Facilitating Science and Mathematics Teachers' Talk About Equity: What Are the Strengths and Limitations of Four Strategies for Professional Learning?
【24h】

Facilitating Science and Mathematics Teachers' Talk About Equity: What Are the Strengths and Limitations of Four Strategies for Professional Learning?

机译:促进科学和数学老师谈论公平:四种专业学习策略的优势和局限性是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigated a 2.5-year professional development effort designed to support practicing science and mathematics teachers in understanding equity and enacting equitable practices. Our purpose was to inform the research base on effective equity professional development, toward the goal of better supporting science and mathematics teachers in transforming their views and practices. Because talk is central to learning, we examined how four strategies for professional learning facilitated or constrained teachers' shared equity talk: (1) engagement in teacher research, (2) reflection on personal experiences, (3) modeling of reform-based instructional practices, and (4) examination of school/stateational data on student course taking and achievement. We asked: How did teachers' shared equity talk vary across these strategies? To answer this question, we qualitatively analyzed recorded seminars, teacher interviews, and written reflections to determine the opportunities each strategy afforded teachers to talk about equity, and the length and substance of teachers' equity talk as a result. We found that, despite teachers' construction of a shared equity discourse and the iterative implementation of professional learning strategies, the type of strategy implemented did indeed matter. Although all four strategies provided teachers similar opportunities to discuss equity, some strategies were more effective than others in facilitating equity conversations.
机译:我们调查了一项为期2.5年的专业发展工作,旨在支持实践科学和数学教师理解公平和制定公平的实践。我们的目的是为有效的股权专业发展提供研究基础,以期更好地支持科学和数学教师转变观念和实践。由于谈话是学习的核心,因此我们研究了四种专业学习策略如何促进或限制教师的共享权益谈话:(1)参与教师研究,(2)反思个人经验,(3)基于改革的教学实践模型,以及(4)检查学校/州/国家/地区有关学生选修课程和成绩的数据。我们问:在这些策略中,教师的共享权益讨论有何不同?为了回答这个问题,我们定性地分析了录制的研讨会,老师的访谈和书面的反思,以确定每种策略为教师提供了谈论公平的机会,并由此确定了教师公平讨论的时间和内容。我们发现,尽管教师构建了共享的公平话语,并且反复实施了专业学习策略,但实施策略的类型确实很重要。尽管所有四种策略都为教师提供了讨论平等的机会,但是某些策略在促进平等对话方面比其他策略更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号