首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Sensitivity and quantitativeness of large-volume injection combined with liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry for target screening analysis of emerging contaminants
【24h】

Sensitivity and quantitativeness of large-volume injection combined with liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry for target screening analysis of emerging contaminants

机译:大体积进样联合液相色谱/高分辨率质谱法对新兴污染物进行靶标筛选分析的灵敏度和定量性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Solid phase extraction (SPE) has been widely used for pretreatment in target screening (TS) analysis. However, some compounds are difficult to recover by SPE or their recovery is unstable for environmental samples. In this study, we tested large-volume injection (LVI) without SPE for TS analysis of 103 compounds listed by the Ministry of the Environment (Japan)-so-called 'items to be surveyed'-using liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. We evaluated the limit of quantification (LOQ) by LVI and compared this LOQ with the LOQ by SPE pretreatment using a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) combined with activated carbon, which was found previously to afford the best SPE cartridges for target compounds recovery. The LOQ generally decreased as the injection volume increased, and the LOQ was at least 250 times lower for a 500-μL injection than for a 2-μL injection for half of the compounds. LVI provided LOQs lower than the predicted no effect concentration for more compounds than the SPE method. The average matrix effect (ME) by LVI was in the range 70-130 for 69 out of 97 compounds. The ME was higher or lower for some of the remaining compounds, but the ME was in the range 10-1000 for all 18 water samples for 84 of the 97 compounds. Comparing the ME by LVI and the recovery ratio by the SPE method showed that LVI achieved more accurate quantitation than the SPE method for a larger number of compounds. Therefore, LVI provides better sensitivity and quantitativeness than the SPE method using HLB and activated carbon for TS analysis of as many 'items to be surveyed' as possible.
机译:固相萃取 (SPE) 已广泛用于靶标筛选 (TS) 分析中的预处理。但是,有些化合物难以通过 SPE 回收,或者对于环境样品,其回收率不稳定。在本研究中,我们使用液相色谱高分辨率质谱法测试了不含 SPE 的大体积进样 (LVI) 对环境省(日本)列出的 103 种化合物(即“调查项目”)的 TS 分析。我们评估了 LVI 的定量限 (LOQ),并将该 LOQ 与使用亲水亲油天平 (HLB) 结合活性炭的 SPE 预处理的 LOQ 进行了比较,之前发现活性炭为目标化合物回收提供了最佳的 SPE 小柱。LOQ 通常随着进样体积的增加而降低,对于一半化合物,500 μL 进样的 LOQ 至少比 2 μL 进样的 LOQ 低 250 倍。与 SPE 方法相比,LVI 提供的 LOQ 低于预测的无效应浓度,适用于更多化合物。97 种化合物中 69 种化合物的平均基质效应 (ME) 在 70%-130% 范围内。其余一些化合物的 ME 较高或较低,但 97 种化合物中 84 种的所有 18 个水样的 ME 在 10%-1000% 范围内。比较 LVI 的 ME 和 SPE 方法的回收率表明,对于大量化合物,LVI 的定量精度高于 SPE 方法。因此,与使用 HLB 和活性炭的 SPE 方法相比,LVI 对尽可能多的“待测项目”进行 TS 分析时具有更好的灵敏度和定量性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Pollution》 |2024年第8期|124180.1-124180.7|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Research Center for Water Environment Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan;

    Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan;

    Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

    Large-volume injection; LC/MS; Target screening analysis; Matrix effect;

    机译:大容量注射;液质联用 (LC/MS);靶点筛选分析;矩阵效果;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号