首页> 外文期刊>LWT-Food Science & Technology >A comparative study of the different analytical methods for analysis of S-allyl cysteine in black garlic by HPLC.
【24h】

A comparative study of the different analytical methods for analysis of S-allyl cysteine in black garlic by HPLC.

机译:HPLC分析黑蒜中 S -烯丙基半胱氨酸的不同分析方法的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A sensitive and reproducible analytical method to measure S-allyl cysteine (SAC) in black garlic was developed using the HPLC-FLD (fluorescence detection) with prior derivatization with AccQ-Fluor Reagent. The results were then compared with those from obtained using the HPLC-UVD (ultraviolet detection) that has been conventionally used for measuring SAC in raw garlic. The SAC content in raw garlic measured by the HPLC-FLD and the HPLC-UVD were 21.52 and 22.73 mug/g, respectively. And these results were satisfactory with coefficient of variation (CV%) of less than 2%. However, the application of the HPLC-UVD for the determination of SAC in black garlic was limited due to the high %CV that arose from the unstable baseline. However, the HPLC-FLD could be applied to the measurement of SAC in black garlic with satisfactory %CV. The HPLC-FLD method was validated by determining the linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy and precision. This method showed excellent linearity with a coefficient of determination (R2) greater than 0.998. The limits of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were 6.28 and 19.02 mug/mL, respectively. The accuracy ranged from 98.51 to 102.08%, and the precision of the method was found to be less than 2%. All rights reserved, Elsevier.
机译:建立了一种灵敏且可重现的分析方法,该方法使用HPLC-FLD(荧光检测)方法测定黑蒜中的 S -烯丙基半胱氨酸(SAC),并预先用AccQ-Fluor试剂衍生化。然后将结果与使用HPLC-UVD(紫外线检测)获得的结果进行比较,该方法通常用于测量生大蒜中的SAC。 HPLC-FLD和HPLC-UVD测定的生大蒜中SAC含量分别为21.52和22.73杯/克。这些结果令人满意,变异系数(CV%)小于2%。但是,由于不稳定的基线会产生较高的%CV,因此HPLC-UVD在测定黑蒜中的SAC方面的应用受到了限制。但是,HPLC-FLD可以用于%CV令人满意的黑大蒜中SAC的测定。 HPLC-FLD方法通过确定线性,检测限,定量限,准确度和精密度进行了验证。该方法显示出极好的线性,测定系数( R 2 )大于0.998。检测限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别为6.28和19.02 mug / mL。准确度在98.51到102.08%之间,发现该方法的准确度小于2%。保留所有权利,Elsevier。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号