...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparison of conventional and cutting balloon angioplasty for congenital and postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis in infants and young children.
【24h】

Comparison of conventional and cutting balloon angioplasty for congenital and postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis in infants and young children.

机译:婴幼儿先天性和术后肺静脉狭窄的常规和切割球囊血管成形术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare and often lethal condition in children. The optimal treatment for congenital and postoperative PVS is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared outcomes of conventional balloon angioplasty performed for PVS from 1999 to 2003 against cutting balloon angioplasty performed from 2004 to 2007. A total of 100 previously undilated pulmonary veins in 54 patients were studied: 48 veins dilated with conventional balloons and 52 with cutting balloons. Acute results included significantly reduced gradients and increased lumen diameters with both treatments. Acutely, cutting balloon angioplasty and conventional angioplasty yielded similar relative reduction of the PVS gradient (median 78% vs. 63%, P = 0.08) and increase in lumen diameter (median 77% vs. 59%, P = 0.07). There was one procedural death of a critically ill infant, and four cardiac arrests, but no adverse events necessitating surgical intervention. Survival free from reintervention was poor in both groups, and shorter in the cutting balloon group (73% at 1 month, 11% at 6 months, and 4% at 1 year) than in the conventional angioplasty group (77% at 1 month, 35% at 6 months, and 23% at 1 year; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and cutting balloon angioplasty were effective at decreasing gradient and increasing lumen size acutely in patients with congenital and postoperative PVS, but reintervention was common with both treatments. Both methods of angioplasty provided limited benefit, and neither was curative for this complex disease.
机译:背景:肺静脉狭窄(PVS)是儿童中一种罕见且经常致命的疾病。先天性和术后PVS的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。方法和结果:我们比较了1999年至2003年对PVS进行的常规球囊血管成形术与2004年至2007年对切开的球囊血管成形术的结果。共研究了54例患者的100条先前未扩张的肺静脉:48例常规球囊扩张静脉和52例与切割气球。急性结果包括两种治疗均显着降低梯度并增加管腔直径。急性地,切割球囊血管成形术和常规血管成形术产生了相似的相对降低PVS梯度的趋势(中位数分别为78%和63%,P = 0.08)和管腔直径的增加(中间值分别为77%和59%,P = 0.07)。一名程序危重的婴儿死亡,四次心脏骤停,但无不良事件需要手术干预。两组患者均无再干预生存率较差,并且切球囊治疗组(1个月时为73%,6​​个月时为11%,1年时为4%)短于常规血管成形术组(1个月时为77%, 6个月为35%,1年为23%; P = 0.01)。结论:对于先天性和术后PVS患者,常规球囊成形术和切开球囊血管成形术均能有效降低梯度并急剧增加管腔大小,但两种治疗均普遍采用再次干预。两种血管成形术方法都提供有限的益处,并且都不能治愈这种复杂的疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号