首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association >Chronic kidney disease and 1-year survival in elderly patients discharged from acute care hospitals: a comparison of three glomerular filtration rate equations.
【24h】

Chronic kidney disease and 1-year survival in elderly patients discharged from acute care hospitals: a comparison of three glomerular filtration rate equations.

机译:从急诊医院出院的老年患者的慢性肾脏疾病和1年生存:三个肾小球滤过率方程的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is directly associated with survival. However, the prognostic significance of GFR might be different according to the formula used to estimate it. We aimed at comparing the association between GFR estimated using three different formulas and 1-year survival in elderly patients discharged from acute care hospitals. METHODS: Our series consisted of 439 patients aged 65 and older admitted to 11 acute care medical wards enrolled in a multicentre prospective observational study. GFR was estimated by body surface area-adjusted Cockcroft-Gault (CG-BSA), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas. The relative risk of mortality in patients with estimated GFR = 30-59.9 or < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) compared to people with estimated GFR >/= 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was calculated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Participants with reduced GFR showed an increased mortality, regardless of the equation used, and the highest one was associated with CG-BSA-estimated GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). After adjusting for potential confounders, CKD-EPI-estimated GFR remained significantly associated with the outcome [30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), hazard ratio (HR) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.02-2.98; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.20-5.66], while the strength of the association was clearly reduced for MDRD (30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.83-2.38; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.01-4.30) and CG-BSA (30-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 0.67-4.53; < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 0.92-7.55). CONCLUSION: GFR adds to the list of prognostic indicators in elderly and frail people, and CKD-EPI-derived GFR, which outperforms to some extent MDRD and CG-BSA-derived GFR in a multivariable predictive model, seems worthy of testing in wider populations.
机译:背景:肾小球滤过率(GFR)与生存率直接相关。但是,根据用于估计GFR的公式,GFR的预后意义可能有所不同。我们旨在比较使用三种不同公式估算的GFR与急诊医院出院的老年患者1年生存率之间的关联。方法:我们的系列包括439名年龄在65岁及以上的患者,这些患者被纳入11个急性护理病房,参加了一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。 GFR是通过调整了身体表面积的Cockcroft-Gault(CG-BSA),肾脏疾病研究中的饮食调整(MDRD)和慢性肾脏病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)公式估算的。使用Cox回归计算出,估计GFR = 30-59.9或<30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2)的患者与估计GFR> / = 60 mL / min / 1.73 m(2)的患者的相对死亡风险通过Cox回归计算分析。结果:无论使用何种方程式,GFR降低的参与者的死亡率均升高,其中最高者与CG-BSA估计的GFR <30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2)相关。调整潜在的混杂因素后,CKD-EPI估计的GFR仍与结果显着相关[30-59.9 mL / min / 1.73 m(2),危险比(HR)= 1.70,95%置信区间(95%CI)= 1.02-2.98; <30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2),HR = 2.60,95%CI = 1.20-5.66],而MDRD的结合强度明显降低(30-59.9 mL / min / 1.73 m(2), HR = 1.47,95%CI = 0.83-2.38; <30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2),HR = 2.07,95%CI = 1.01-4.30)和CG-BSA(30-59.9 mL / min / 1.73 m (2),HR = 1.79,95%CI = 0.67-4.53; <30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2),HR = 2.68,95%CI = 0.92-7.55)。结论:GFR增加了老年人和体弱者的预后指标,而CKD-EPI衍生的GFR在多变量预测模型中在一定程度上胜过MDRD和CG-BSA衍生的GFR,似乎值得在更广泛的人群中进行测试。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号