首页> 外文期刊>Korean Journal of Crop Science >Quality of Jeonbuk-originated brand rice compared with other domestic brands and imported market rice.
【24h】

Quality of Jeonbuk-originated brand rice compared with other domestic brands and imported market rice.

机译:与其他国产品牌和进口市场大米相比,全北起源大米的质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was carried out to estimate the quality of Jeonbuk-originated brand rice by comparing with other domestic brand rices and imported market rices. Rice variety, "Ilmi" was a major portion of brand rices in Jeonbuk region, and in few portion, there were variety-mixed brands, Shindongjin, Kosihikari, and Hitomebore. Comparing the ratio of head rice of high-quality Jeonbuk-originated brand rice with other domestic brand rices were not significantly different. Head rice ratio and mechanical taste values were not significantly different between high-quality Jeonbuk-originated brand rice and the other domestic brand rices. The contents of protein, moisture, amylose of rice were also not significantly different between them. The quality of high-quality Jeonbuk-originated brand rice was as good as that of other domestic brand rices and had not changed it by period. The foreign rice imported from United States, Chinese (involved parboiled), Thailand and the domestic rice cultivated in Jeonbuk province were investigated. There could get difference on the major component related to palatability of rice as country in this study. Comparing with foreign rices, protein content of domestic rice (6.1%) was similar with that of United States, lower than those of Chinese and Thailand. The head rice ratio of the domestic rice was 92%, which was similar with those of Unite State and Chinese but the Chinese parboiled rice was completely cracked during processing. The setback viscosity of domestic rice related to retrogradation was lower than those of the imported rice except United States. The Ad (Adhesiveness/H (Hardness)) ratio was higher in the domestic and United States rice.
机译:本研究通过与其他国产品牌大米和进口市场大米进行比较,估算了全北起源大米的质量。大米品种“ Ilmi”是全北地区大米品牌的主要组成部分,很少有新东津,Kosihikari和Hitomebore等品种混合品牌。源自全北的优质品牌大米与其他国产品牌大米的原稻比例没有显着差异。优质的全北起源品牌大米与其他国产品牌大米的头米比和机械味觉值无显着差异。稻米中蛋白质,水分,直链淀粉的含量也无明显差异。起源于全北的优质大米的质量与其他国产大米的质量相同,并且在不同时期之前都没有改变。考察了从美国,中国(涉水),泰国进口的外国大米以及在全北省种植的国内大米。在本研究中,与稻米适口性有关的主要成分可能存在差异。与外国大米相比,国内大米的蛋白质含量(6.1%)与美国相似,低于中国和泰国。国产大米的稻米率达到92%,与美国和中国的稻米率相似,但中国煮米在加工过程中完全破裂。除美国外,与回生有关的国产大米的挫折粘度低于进口大米。在国内和美国的大米中,Ad(粘附性/ H(硬度))比率较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号