...
首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research: International Journal on Mutagenesis, Chromosome Breakage and Related Subjects >A comparison of the soft agar and microtitre methodologies for the L5178Y tk +/- mouse lymphoma assay.
【24h】

A comparison of the soft agar and microtitre methodologies for the L5178Y tk +/- mouse lymphoma assay.

机译:L5178Y tk +/-小鼠淋巴瘤测定的软琼脂和微量滴定方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The L5178Y tk +/- mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) has been validated as a sensitive and specific test system for the detection of mutagens/clastogens. There are currently two methodologies for performing the MLA: the original soft agar procedure and the newer microtitre procedure. While both procedures are considered acceptable, a limited amount of comparative information exists for the two methods. In this report the two methods were compared with regard to: (1) spontaneous and induced mutant frequencies; (2) cloning efficiencies; and (3) colony size distributions for mutants. In addition, small and large mutant colonies from microtitre wells were rechallenged for trifluorothymidine (TFT) resistance. In a majority of the cases, cloning efficiency values were higher for the microtitre as were the spontaneous and induced mutation frequency (MF) values. Nevertheless, when responses were compared according to mutation index (fold increase over background MF) the results from the two systems were often similar.More spontaneous small colonies were observed in the microtitre assay. While colony size distribution for induced mutant colonies was compound specific, generally, more small colonies were counted in microtitre. All mutant clones that were rechallenged with TFT demonstrated resistance. Aside from the differences mentioned above, both the microtitre and the soft agar procedures appear equally capable of identifying mutagenic agents.
机译:L5178Y tk +/-小鼠淋巴瘤测定法(MLA)已被证实是用于检测诱变剂/弹性蛋白酶的灵敏且特异的测试系统。当前有两种执行MLA的方法:原始的软琼脂程序和较新的微量滴定程序。虽然两种方法都可以接受,但两种方法的比较信息有限。在本报告中,两种方法在以下方面进行了比较:(1)自发和诱发突变频率; (2)克隆效率; (3)突变体的菌落大小分布。此外,对来自微量滴定孔的大小突变突变体的三氟胸苷(TFT)抗性也提出了挑战。在大多数情况下,微量滴定的克隆效率值更高,自发和诱导突变频率(MF)值也更高。然而,当根据突变指数(相对于背景MF的增加倍)比较响应时,两个系统的结果通常相似。在微量滴定法中观察到更多的自发小菌落。虽然诱导的突变菌落的菌落大小分布是化合物特异性的,但通常在微量滴定法中计数到更多的小菌落。用TFT挑战的所有突变克隆均显示出抗性。除了上述差异外,微量滴定法和软琼脂程序都同样具有识别诱变剂的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号