...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:基于计算机的教学与基于循证医学的循证教学一样好:随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Assessing in undergraduate medical education the educational effectiveness of a short computer-based session, integrating a lecturer's video with a standardized structure, for evidence based medicine (EBM) teaching, compared to a lecture-based teaching session of similar structure and duration. METHOD: A concealed, randomized controlled trial of computer based session versus lecture of equal duration (40 minutes) and identical content in EBM and systematic reviews. The study was based at the Medical School, University of Birmingham, UK involving one hundred and seventynine year one medical students. The main outcome measures were change from pre to post-intervention score measured using a validated questionnaire assessing knowledge (primary outcome) and attitudes (secondary outcome). RESULTS: Participants' improvement in knowledge in the computer based group was equivalent to the lecture based group (gain in score: 0.8 [S.D = 3.2] versus 1.3 [S.D = 2.4]; p = 0.24). Attitudinal gains were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Computer based teaching and typical lecture sessions have similar educational gains.
机译:背景:在本科医学教育中,与基于类似结构和持续时间的基于讲座的教学课程相比,评估基于计算机的短期课程的教学效果,将讲师的视频与标准化结构集成在一起,用于循证医学(EBM)教学。方法:一项隐蔽的,随机对照的基于计算机的会话相对于相同时间(40分钟)的演讲以及EBM和系统评价中相同内容的演讲。这项研究基于英国伯明翰大学医学院的研究,涉及一百零七年级的医学生。主要结局指标为干预前得分至干预后得分的变化,干预前得分采用经过验证的问卷调查评估知识(主要结果)和态度(次要结果)。结果:计算机组的参与者知识水平的提高与演讲组的知识水平相同(得分分别为0.8 [S.D = 3.2]和1.3 [S.D = 2.4]; p = 0.24)。两组的态度增益相似。结论:基于计算机的教学和典型的讲座具有相似的教育收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号