首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status
【24h】

Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status

机译:影响居民对临床教员教学质量和榜样地位的评估的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Evaluations of faculty members are widely used to identify excellent or substandard teaching performance. In order to enable such evaluations to be properly interpreted and used in faculty development, it is essential to understand the factors that influence resident doctors' (residents) evaluations of the teaching qualities of faculty members and their perceptions of faculty members as role-model specialists. Methods We carried out a cross-sectional survey within a longitudinal study of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) of clinical teachers. The study sample included 889 residents and 1014 faculty members in 61 teaching programmes spanning 22 specialties in 20 hospitals in the Netherlands. Main outcome measures included residents' (i) global and (ii) specific ratings of faculty member teaching qualities, and (iii) global ratings of faculty members as role-model specialists. Statistical analysis was conducted using adjusted multivariable logistic generalised estimating equations. Results In total, 690 residents (77.6%) completed 6485 evaluations of 962 faculty members, 848 (83.6%) of whom also self-evaluated. More recently certified faculty members, those who had attended a teacher training programme, and those who spent more time teaching than seeing patients or conducting research were more likely to score highly on most teaching qualities. However, faculty members who had undergone teacher training were less likely to be seen as role models (odds ratio [OR]0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.88). In addition, faculty members were evaluated slightly higher by male than female residents on core teaching domains and overall teaching quality, but were less likely to be seen as role models by male residents (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). Lastly, faculty members had higher odds of receiving top scores in specific teaching domains from residents in the first 4years of residency and were less likely to be considered as role models by more senior residents. Conclusions Younger faculty members who dedicated more time to teaching, had attended a teacher training programme, and were evaluated by male residents in the early years of residency were more likely to receive higher scores for teaching performance.
机译:目标教师评估被广泛用于确定优秀或不合格的教学表现。为了使此类评估能够正确地解释和用于教师发展,必须了解影响住院医生(住院医师)对教师教学质量的评估及其对教师作为榜样专家的看法的因素。方法我们在临床教师教学质量评估系统(SETQ)的纵向研究中进行了横断面调查。该研究样本包括61个教学计划中的889名居民和1014名教职员工,这些计划涵盖了荷兰20所医院的22个专业。主要成果衡量指标包括居民(i)整体和(ii)教员教学质量的具体评分,以及(iii)教员作为榜样专家的总体评分。使用调整后的多元逻辑广义估计方程进行统计分析。结果共有690名居民(77.6%)完成了对962名教职员工的6485次评估,其中848人(83.6%)也进行了自我评估。最近获得认证的教职员工,参加过教师培训课程的教师以及花费更多时间在教学上而不是去看病人或进行研究的人在大多数教学质量上得分较高。但是,接受过教师培训的教职员工不太可能被视为榜样(优势比[OR] 0.72,95%置信区间[CI] 0.59-0.88)。此外,在核心教学领域和整体教学质量上,男性居民对教职员工的评价略高于女性,但男性居民不太可能将她们视为榜样(OR 0.80,95%CI 0.67-0.97)。最后,在居住的头四年中,教师在居民的特定教学领域中获得最高分的几率较高,并且不太可能被更多的高级居民视为榜样。结论花费更多时间从事教学,参加过教师培训计划并在居住初期就接受男性居民评估的年轻教师更有可能获得更高的教学成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号