首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Evidence-based education: development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions.
【24h】

Evidence-based education: development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions.

机译:循证教育:开发一种对教育干预报告进行严格评估的工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Educational interventions may ultimately impact on patient care as well as affecting individuals' learning. Critical evaluation of educational literature by those involved in designing and developing educational interventions is therefore important. A checklist instrument for critically appraising reports of educational interventions is described. DESIGN: The instrument was developed by an iterative process and piloted. The instrument consists of nine questions: 1. Is there a clear question which the study seeks to answer? 2. Is there a clear learning need which the intervention seeks to address? 3. Is there a clear description of the educational context for the intervention? 4. Is the precise nature of the intervention clear? 5. Is the study design able to answer the question posed by the study? 6. Are the methods within the design capable of appropriately measuring the phenomena which the intervention ought to produce? 7. Are the outcomes chosen to evaluate the intervention appropriate? 8. Are there any other explanations of the results explored in the study? 9. Are any unanticipated outcomes explained? A worked example is given to illustrate how the instrument can be used in practice. SETTING: The Department of General Practice in Glasgow. SUBJECTS: Young general practitioners and the Educational Journal Club. RESULTS: The instrument was feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the checklist allows the reader to critically appraise reports of educational interventions and helps in the practice of evidence-based education.
机译:目的:教育干预最终可能会影响患者的护理并影响个人的学习。因此,参与设计和开发教育干预措施的人员对教育文献的批判性评估很重要。描述了一种用于严格评估教育干预报告的清单工具。设计:该仪器是通过迭代过程开发并进行试验的。该工具包括九个问题:1.研究是否有明确的问题要回答? 2.干预旨在解决明确的学习需求吗? 3.对干预的教育背景是否有清楚的描述? 4.干预的确切性质是否明确? 5.研究设计是否能够回答研究提出的问题? 6.设计中的方法是否能够适当地测量干预应产生的现象? 7.选择用于评估干预措施的结果是否合适? 8.对研究中发现的结果还有其他解释吗? 9.是否有任何无法预料的结果得到解释?给出了一个实际的例子来说明该仪器如何在实践中使用。地点:格拉斯哥普通实践系。主题:年轻的全科医生和教育期刊俱乐部。结果:该仪器可行。结论:清单的使用使读者能够批判性地评估教育干预的报告,并有助于实践循证教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号