...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and bioprocess technology >Cost analysis and environmental impact of pulsed electric fields and high pressure processing in comparison with thermal pasteurization.
【24h】

Cost analysis and environmental impact of pulsed electric fields and high pressure processing in comparison with thermal pasteurization.

机译:与热巴氏灭菌相比,脉冲电场和高压处理的成本分析和环境影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The cost of high pressure processing (HPP) and the environmental impact of pulsed electric fields (PEF), HPP and thermal pasteurization of orange juice were estimated in the US. The cost analysis was based on commercial processing conditions that were validated for a 2-month shelf-life of orange juice under refrigeration conditions. Total electricity consumption was estimated to be 38,100 and 1,000,000 k Wh/year for thermal and HPP processing, respectively. Total pasteurization cost of HPP was estimated to be 10.7 cents/l for processing 16,500,000 l/year (3,000 l/h). Of this, capital costs accounted for 59 % (6.3 cents/l), labor costs accounted for 37 % (4.0 cents/l) and utility charges, mainly electricity, accounted for 4 % (0.4 cents/l). The total HPP cost was 7-folds higher than that of conventional thermal processing (1.5 cents/l). The equivalent CO2 emission was 90,000 kg for thermal processing and 700,000 and 773,000 kg for PEF and HPP, respectively. This corresponds to an increase between 7- and 8-folds in comparison to the thermal processing. Increasing the production output by 2- to 6-folds reduced the total production costs of nonthermal processing by 50-75 %. A deeper knowledge of the processing costs and environmental impact of nonthermal technologies will afford companies a better understanding of the benefits and limitations of these novel systems. copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014.
机译:在美国,估计了高压处理(HPP)的成本以及脉冲电场(PEF),HPP和橙汁的热巴氏杀菌对环境的影响。成本分析基于商业加工条件,该条件在冷藏条件下已验证为橙汁的2个月保质期。估计热和HPP加工的总电力消耗分别为38,100和1,000,000 k Wh /年。 HPP的总巴氏灭菌成本估计为每处理16,500,000升/年(3,000升/小时)为10.7美分/升。其中,资本成本占59%(6.3美分/升),劳动力成本占37%(4.0美分/升),公用事业费用占主要比例,电费占4%(0.4美分/升)。 HPP的总成本是传统热处理(1.5美分/升)的7倍。热处理的等效CO 2 排放量为90,000 kg,PEF和HPP的等效排放量分别为700,000和773,000 kg。与热处理相比,这相当于增加了7到8倍。将产量提高2到6倍,可将非热处理的总生产成本降低50-75%。对非热技术的处理成本和环境影响的更深入了解将使公司更好地了解这些新型系统的优点和局限性。版权所有Springer Science + Business Media纽约(美国以外)2014。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号