...
首页> 外文期刊>Food analytical methods >Testing the Robustness of Validated Methods for Quantitative Detection of GMOs Across qPCR Instruments
【24h】

Testing the Robustness of Validated Methods for Quantitative Detection of GMOs Across qPCR Instruments

机译:测试跨qPCR仪器定量检测GMO的有效方法的稳健性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The number of real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) instruments available has greatly increased over recent years. However, little information is available on the performance of validated quantitative methods when tested in different instruments.A study has been designed to evaluate the robustness of three validated methods for genetically modified organisms (GMO) quantification across six real-time platforms from four different suppliers. The performance of three validated methods for event-specific detection of Bt11 maize, DAS 59122 maize and MON 89788 soybean was evaluated on six qPCR platforms (ABI 7900 HT, ABI Prism~R 7700 and ABI 7500 from Applied Biosystems; LightCycler~R 480 from Roche; Mx3005P~R from Stratagene; and iQ~(TN) 5 from Bio-Rad). Method performance criteria were compared against European Network of GMO Laboratories method performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. The latter comparison indicates that the criteria are fulfilled for most of the platformsand levels of GMO concentrations, though with minor exceptions. The analysis of variance (one-way) indicated that the quantification of GMOs was affected by the platforms, which did not respond consistently across GM levels. A two-way analysis of variance confirmed that there were significant interactions between platforms and GM levels. The pairwise comparison of the platforms' performance indicated that some deviate significantly from others, though differences between methods were observed.
机译:近年来,可用的实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)仪器的数量已大大增加。然而,在不同的仪器上进行测试时,关于经过验证的定量方法的性能的信息很少。一项旨在评估三种经过验证的方法的稳健性的研究旨在通过四个不同供应商的六个实时平台对转基因生物(GMO)进行量化。在六个qPCR平台(Applied Biosystems的ABI 7900 HT,ABI Prism〜R 7700和ABI 7500; LightCycler〜R 480)上的六个qPCR平台上评估了三种经过验证的Bt11玉米,DAS 59122玉米和MON 89788大豆事件特异性检测方法的性能Roche; Stratagene的Mx3005P〜R; Bio-Rad的iQ〜(TN)5)。将方法性能标准与GMO实验室的分析方法的欧洲GMO实验室网络方法性能要求进行了比较。后者的比较表明,除少数例外情况外,大多数平台和转基因生物浓度均符合标准。方差分析(单向)表明,转基因生物的定量受到平台的影响,平台在基因改造水平上并不一致。双向方差分析证实,平台和GM水平之间存在显着的相互作用。平台性能的成对比较表明,尽管观察到的方法之间存在差异,但某些平台与其他平台明显不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号