...
首页> 外文期刊>Genetics in medicine >Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
【24h】

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

机译:解释序列变异的标准和指南:美国医学遗传学和基因组学学会以及分子病理学协会的联合共识建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved -rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next-generation -sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next-generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever-increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes, and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprising representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the College of American Pathologists to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP, and College of American Pathologists stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories, including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes, and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology-"pathogenic," "likely pathogenic," "uncertain significance," "likely benign," and "benign"-to describe variants identified in genes that cause Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classifying variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g., population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved laboratory, with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or the equivalent.
机译:美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院(ACMG)以前为序列变异的解释制定了指南。 1在过去的十年中,随着高通量下一代测序技术的出现,测序技术得到了迅速发展。通过采用并利用下一代测序技术,临床实验室现在正在执行越来越多的基因测试目录,涵盖基因分型,单基因,基因组,外显子组,基因组,转录组和表观遗传学检测。由于复杂性的增加,基因测试的这种转变伴随着序列解释的新挑战。在这种情况下,ACMG在2013年召集了一个工作组,由ACMG,分子病理学协会(AMP)和美国病理学家学会的代表组成,以重新审视和修订解释序列变异的标准和指南。该小组由临床实验室主任和临床医生组成。该报告代表了工作组的专家意见,并得到了ACMG,AMP和美国病理学家学院利益相关者的意见。这些建议主要适用于临床实验室所用基因测试的广度,包括基因分型,单基因,检测,外显子组和基因组。该报告建议使用特定的标准术语-“致病性”,“可能是致病性的”,“不确定意义”,“可能是良性的”和“良性”来描述在导致孟德尔疾病的基因中鉴定出的变异。而且,该建议描述了使用典型类型的变体证据(例如,人口数据,计算数据,功能数据,隔离数据)基于标准将变体分为这五类的过程。由于本报告中描述的临床基因测试的分析和解释的复杂性不断提高,ACMG强烈建议临床分子基因测试应在经临床实验室改进修正案批准的实验室中进行,其结果应由董事会认证的临床分子进行解释。遗传学家或分子遗传病理学家或同等学历。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号