首页>
外文期刊>European journal of orthodontics
>A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated with various maxillary incisor intrusion biomechanics.
【24h】
A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated with various maxillary incisor intrusion biomechanics.
The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the intrusive forces and buccolingual torquing moments generated during anterior maxillary intrusion using different maxillary incisor intrusion mechanics. Five wire specimens were used for each of the following intrusive arches: blue Elgiloy utility arch 0.016 x 0.016 inch, TMA utility arch 0.017 x 0.025 inch, Burstone TMA intrusion arch 0.017 x 0.025 inch, and reverse curve of Spee NiTi 0.016 x 0.022 inch. The wires were inserted on bracketed dental arches constructed on maxillary Frasaco models, segmented mesially to the maxillary canines. Simulated intrusion from 0.0 to 3 mm was performed using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS), and forces and moments were recorded in the sagittal plane at 0.1 mm vertical displacement increments. All measurements were repeated five times for each specimen and values recorded at 1.5 mm for all wires were used for statistical evaluations. The results were analysed with one-way analysis of variance with forces and moments serving as the dependent variables and wire type as the independent variable. Post hoc multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey test (0.05 error rate). Comparison of the two major intrusion techniques for the maxillary anterior teeth, segmented and bioprogressive, revealed that the Burstone TMA 0.017 x 0.025 inch intrusion arch exerted the lowest force on the incisors (0.99 N), followed by the TMA utility 0.017 x 0.025 inch (1.33 N) and the blue Elgiloy 0.016 x 0.016 inch utility (1.43 N). The highest force was recorded for the reverse curve of Spee NiTi and exceeded the value of 9 N. The lowest buccolingual moments were recorded with the Burstone intrusion arch (2.47 Nmm), whereas the highest was registered for the utility arch constructed with a 0.017 x 0.025 inch TMA wire (7.31 Nmm).
展开▼
机译:本研究的目的是使用不同的上颌切牙切入机制,比较评估上颌前切入过程中产生的切入力和颊舌力矩。下列侵入式弓中的每一个都使用了五个钢丝标本:蓝色Elgiloy实用弓0.016 x 0.016英寸,TMA实用弓0.017 x 0.025英寸,Burstone TMA侵入弓0.017 x 0.025英寸以及Spee NiTi的反向曲线0.016 x 0.022英寸。将导线插入在上颌骨Frasaco模型上制成的带支架的牙弓上,并与上颌骨近端分段。使用正畸测量和模拟系统(OMSS)进行了从0.0到3毫米的模拟侵入,力和力矩以0.1毫米的垂直位移增量记录在矢状面上。对于每个样品,将所有测量重复五次,并将所有导线在1.5mm处记录的值用于统计评估。对结果进行单向方差分析,以力和力矩为因变量,以导线类型为自变量。使用Tukey检验(0.05的错误率)进行事后多重比较。比较上颌前牙的两种主要切入技术(分段切入式和生物渐进式),发现Burstone TMA 0.017 x 0.025英寸侵入弓对门牙施加的力最低(0.99 N),其次是TMA实用工具0.017 x 0.025英寸( 1.33 N)和蓝色的Elgiloy 0.016 x 0.016英寸实用工具(1.43 N)。 Spee NiTi的反向弯曲记录的最大力超过9N。Burstone侵入拱形记录的最小颊侧弯矩为(2.47 Nmm),而0.017 x x的实用弓形记录的最大弯矩为最大。 0.025英寸TMA导线(7.31 Nmm)。
展开▼