首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure with an over-the-endoscope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study (with videos).
【24h】

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure with an over-the-endoscope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study (with videos).

机译:内孔镜内窥镜封闭自然孔腔内窥镜手术的胃口术:一项随机,对照的猪研究(带视频)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Secure endoscopic closure of transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) access is of paramount importance. The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system has previously been shown to be effective for NOTES gastrotomy closure. OBJECTIVE: To compare OTSC gastrotomy closure with surgical closure. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled animal study. SETTING: Animal facility laboratory. ANIMALS: Thirty-six female domestic pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Gastrotomies were created by using a needle-knife and an 18-mm balloon. The animals were subsequently randomized to either open surgical repair with interrupted sutures or endoscopic repair with 12-mm OTSCs. In addition, pressurized leak tests were performed in ex vivo specimens of 18-mm scalpel incisions closed with suture (n = 14) and of intact stomachs (n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The mean time for endoscopic closure was 9.8 minutes (range 3-22, SD 5.5). No complications occurred during either type of gastrotomy closure. At necropsy, examination of all OTSC and surgical closures demonstrated complete sealing of gastrotomy sites without evidence of injury to adjacent organs. Pressurized leak tests showed a mean burst pressure of 83 mm Hg (range 30-140, SD 27) for OTSC closures and 67 mm Hg (range 30-130, SD 27.7) for surgical sutures. Ex vivo hand-sewn sutures of 18-mm gastrotomies (n = 14) exhibited a mean burst pressure of 65 mm Hg (range 20-140, SD 31) and intact ex vivo stomachs (n = 10) had a mean burst pressure of 126 mm Hg (range 90-170, SD 28). The burst pressure of ex vivo intact stomachs was significantly higher compared with OTSC closures (P < .01), in vivo surgical closures (P < .01), and ex vivo hand-sewn closures (P < .01). There was a trend toward higher burst pressures in the OTSC closures compared with surgical closures (P = .063) and ex vivo hand-sewn closures (P = .094). In vivo surgical closures demonstrated similar burst pressures compared with ex vivo hand-sewn closures (P = .848). LIMITATIONS: Nonsurvival setting. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic closure by using the OTSC system is comparable to surgical closure in a nonsurvival porcine model. This technique is easy to perform and is suitable for NOTES gastrotomy closure.
机译:背景:安全的内镜关闭经胃自然孔腔内腔镜手术(NOTES)通路是至关重要的。以前已经证明,镜夹(OTSC)系统对于NOTES胃切除术闭合是有效的。目的:比较OTSC胃切除术与手术封闭术的比较。设计:随机对照动物研究。地点:动物设施实验室。动物:三十六头母猪。干预措施:用一把针刀和一个18毫米的气球制作美食。随后将动物随机分为开放式手术修复和间断缝合,或内窥镜修复12毫米OTSC。另外,在离体标本中进行了加压渗漏测试,这些标本采用缝合线(n = 14)和完整胃(n = 10)封闭的18毫米解剖刀切口。主要观察指标:内镜关闭的平均时间为9.8分钟(范围3-22,SD 5.5)。两种胃切除术均未发生并发症。尸检时,检查所有的OTSC和手术闭合部位,可以完全密封胃切除部位,而没有损伤相邻器官的证据。加压泄漏测试显示,OTSC闭合的平均破裂压力为83 mm Hg(范围30-140,SD 27),外科缝合线的平均破裂压力为67 mm Hg(范围30-130,SD 27.7)。 18毫米胃造口术的体外缝合线(n = 14)的平均破裂压力为65毫米汞柱(范围20-140,SD 31),完整的离体胃(n = 10)的平均破裂压力为126毫米汞柱(范围90-170,SD 28)。与OTSC封堵(P <.01),体内外科封堵(P <.01)和离体手工缝合封堵(P <.01)相比,离体完整胃的破裂压力明显更高。与外科手术封闭(P = .063)和离体手工缝制封闭(P = .094)相比,OTSC封闭中存在更高的爆裂压力趋势。与离体手工缝制的封闭件相比,体内外科封闭件显示出相似的破裂压力(P = .848)。局限性:非生存环境。结论:在非生存性猪模型中,使用OTSC系统的内窥镜封闭与手术封闭相当。该技术易于执行,适用于NOTES胃切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号