首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies.
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies.

机译:随机对照试验比较了内窥镜夹子和超广角夹子对自然孔腔内腔镜手术截吻术的闭合性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Secure and reliable endoscopic closure is of paramount importance before clinical introduction of transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Gastrotomy closure in humans using standard endoclips has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of standard endoclip closure and to compare it to a new over-the-scope clip (OTSC) specifically designed for gastrotomy closure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Gastric wall puncture and balloon dilation followed by peritoneoscopy was carried out in 20 female swine. After randomization, closure of the gastric incision was performed using a tissue approximation grasper and either endoclips or OTSCs. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) time for gastrotomy closure using endoclips was 31.5 +/- 24.2 minutes (range 8 - 88 minutes) compared with 8.5 +/- 9.1 minutes (range 2 - 31 minutes) using OTSC (P = 0.002). No intraoperative complications occurred. Laparoscopic leak tests with insufflation and saline immersion demonstrated three minor leaks and one major leak in the endoclip closures. No leaks were observed in the OTSC group. At necropsy, complete sealing of the gastrotomy sites was found in all OTSC closures. Small, localized perigastric abscesses were observed in two animals in the OTSC group and in three animals in the endoclip group. One animal in the endoclip group was sacrificed prematurely due to signs of sepsis and was found to have gross peritonitis secondary to a leak. At necropsy, evidence of peritonitis was identified in two other animals in the endoclip group. CONCLUSION: NOTES gastrotomy closure using standard endoclips, even with a tissue approximation grasper, is associated with an increased risk of leakage and intra-abdominal infection compared with OTSC. The significance of perigastric abscesses, which were seen in both groups, warrants further investigation.
机译:背景与研究目的:安全可靠的内窥镜关闭术在临床上引入经胃自然孔腔内腔镜手术(NOTES)之前至关重要。已经报道了使用标准内窥镜在人的胃中进行胃口闭合术。这项研究的目的是评估标准内窥镜闭合术的安全性,并将其与专为胃镜闭合术设计的新型超广角镜夹(OTSC)进行比较。材料与方法:在20只雌性猪中进行胃壁穿刺和球囊扩张,然后进行腹膜镜检查。随机分组后,使用组织逼近抓紧器和内窥镜或OTSC闭合胃切口。结果:使用内窥镜进行胃镜闭合术的平均(+/- SD)时间为31.5 +/- 24.2分钟(8-88分钟),而使用OTSC的平均时间为8.5 +/- 9.1分钟(2-31分钟)(P = 0.002 )。术中无并发症发生。腹腔镜渗入法和盐水浸入的渗漏测试表明,在内窥镜闭合处出现了3次轻微渗漏和1次主要渗漏。在OTSC组中未观察到泄漏。尸检时,发现所有OTSC封口处的胃切除部位均完全密封。在OTSC组的两只动物和内窥镜检查组的三只动物中观察到小的局部胃周脓肿。由于败血症的征兆,内窥镜治疗组的一只动物过早地被处死,发现其患有继发于渗漏的严重腹膜炎。尸检时,在内窥镜检查组的另外两只动物中发现了腹膜炎的证据。结论:与OTSC相比,使用标准内窥镜进行术式闭合术,即使使用组织近似抓紧器,也会增加渗漏和腹腔内感染的风险。两组均可见胃周脓肿的重要性,有待进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号