首页> 外文期刊>European urology >The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review
【24h】

The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review

机译:淋巴结清扫术的范围对行膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术的患者肿瘤结局的影响:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context Controversy exists regarding the therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy (LND) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).Objective To systematically review the relevant literature assessing the impact of LND on oncologic and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RC for MIBC. Evidence acquisition Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS) were searched up to December 2013. Comparative studies reporting on no LND, limited LND (L-LND), standard LND (S-LND), extended LND (E-LND), superextended LND (SE-LND), and oncologic and perioperative outcomes were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed. Evidence synthesis Twenty-three studies reporting on 19 793 patients were included. All but one study were retrospective. Planned meta-analyses were not possible because of study heterogeneity; therefore, data were synthesized narratively. There were high risks of bias and confounding across most studies as well as extreme heterogeneity in the definition of the anatomic boundaries of LND templates. All seven studies comparing LND with no LND favored LND in terms of better oncologic outcomes. Seven of 14 studies comparing (super)extended LND with L-LND or S-LND reported a beneficial outcome for (super)extended LND in at least a subset of patients. No difference in outcome was reported in two studies comparing E-LND and S-LND. The comparative harms of different extents of LND remain unclear.Conclusions Although the quality of the data was poor, the available evidence indicates that any kind of LND is advantageous over no LND. Similarly, E-LND appears to be superior to lesser degrees of dissection, while SE-LND offered no additional benefits. It is hoped that data from ongoing randomized clinical trials will clarify remaining uncertainties.Patient summary The current literature suggests that removal of lymph nodes in bladder cancer surgery is beneficial and might result in better outcomes in terms of prolonging survival; however, the quality of the available studies is poor, and high-quality studies are needed.
机译:背景关于淋巴结清扫术(LND)在行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的治疗价值方面存在争议。目的系统地回顾相关文献,评估LND对行淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤和围手术期结果的影响MIBC的RC。截至2013年12月,检索了证据采集Medline,Medline进行中的Embase,对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册以及拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区的健康科学信息中心(LILACS)。比较研究报告没有LND,LND受限( L-LND),标准LND(S-LND),扩展LND(E-LND),超扩展LND(SE-LND)以及肿瘤和围手术期结局。进行了偏见风险和混杂评估。证据综合包括23项研究报告了19 793例患者。除一项研究外,所有研究均为回顾性研究。由于研究的异质性,无法进行计划的荟萃分析。因此,数据是叙述性的。在大多数研究中,存在偏倚和混淆的高风险,以及LND模板的解剖边界定义中的极端异质性。就更好的肿瘤学结局而言,所有七项比较LND与无LND的研究均支持LND。在比较(超级)扩展LND与L-LND或S-LND的14项研究中,有7篇报告了至少一部分患者对(超级)扩展LND的有益结果。在两项比较E-LND和S-LND的研究中,未报告结局差异。结论不同程度LND的比较危害尚不清楚。结论尽管数据质量较差,但现有证据表明,任何LND都比无LND更具优势。同样,E-LND似乎要优于较小的解剖程度,而SE-LND并没有提供其他好处。希望从正在进行的随机临床试验中获得的数据可以澄清仍然存在的不确定性。病人总结目前的文献表明,在膀胱癌手术中切除淋巴结是有益的,并可能在延长生存期方面带来更好的结果。但是,现有研究的质量很差,需要高质量的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号