首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Assessment of pulmonary function after lobectomy for lung cancer--upper lobectomy might have the same effect as lung volume reduction surgery.
【24h】

Assessment of pulmonary function after lobectomy for lung cancer--upper lobectomy might have the same effect as lung volume reduction surgery.

机译:肺癌肺叶切除术后肺功能的评估-上部肺叶切除可能与减少肺体积手术具有相同的效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in well-selected patients with severe emphysema results in postoperative improvement in symptoms and pulmonary function. Experience with LVRS suggests that predicted postoperative FEV(1.0) may be underestimated after lobectomy in patients with lung cancer and emphysema. As most of the patients with lung cancer have more or less emphysematous changes in the lungs, we assumed that lobectomy would achieve the same effect as LVRS even in patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the pulmonary function test. We assessed changes in pulmonary function in terms of 'volume reduction effect' after lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent right upper lobectomy (RUL), 38 patients left upper lobectomy (LUL), 39 patients right lower lobectomy (RLL), and 38 patients left lower lobectomy (LLL). Pulmonary function tests were performed preoperatively and 6 months to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Percent change in FEV(1.0) after lobectomy was -6.9+/-16.1% in RUL group, -11.2+/-16.9% in LUL group, -14.7+/-9.8% in RLL group, and -12.8+/-9.5% in LLL group. We evaluated the correlation between a preoperative FEV(1.0)% of predicted and percentage change in FEV(1.0) after lobectomy. There were no significant relationships between these variables in RLL or LLL group. In contrast, there were significant negative relationships between these variables in RUL and LUL groups. Correlation coefficients were r = -0.667, p < 0.0001 for RUL and r = -0.712, p < 0.0001 for LUL. In RUL and LUL groups, patients with a higher preoperative FEV(1.0)% of predicted had a more adverse percentage change in FEV(1.0) after surgery. In addition, all 13 patients with a preoperative FEV(1.0)% of predicted <60% in RUL and LUL groups had an increase in FEV(1.0) postoperatively. Patients with a lower preoperative FEV(1.0)% of predicted had a greater 'volume reduction effect' with an increase in FEV(1.0) after upper lobectomy. CONCLUSION: Upper lobectomy might have a volume reduction effect.
机译:目的:对精心挑选的重度肺气肿患者进行肺减容术(LVRS)可改善术后症状和肺功能。 LVRS的经验表明,对于患有肺气肿和肺气肿的患者,肺叶切除术后的预测术后FEV(1.0)可能被低估了。由于大多数肺癌患者的肺气肿或多或少发生肺气肿变化,因此我们认为即使在无慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺功能检查患者中,肺叶切除术也能达到与LVRS相同的效果。我们根据肺叶切除术后的“减量效应”评估了肺功能的变化。方法:43例患者接受了右上叶切除术(RUL),38例接受了左上叶切除术(LUL),39例患者接受了右下叶切除术(RLL),38例患者接受了左下叶切除术(LLL)。术前和术后6个月至1年进行肺功能检查。结果:RUL组肺叶切除术后FEV(1.0)的变化百分比为:RUL组为-6.9 +/- 16.1%,LUL组为-11.2 +/- 16.9%,RLL组为-14.7 +/- 9.8%和-12.8 + / LLL组为-9.5%。我们评估了肺叶切除术后术前FEV(1.0)%的预期值与FEV(1.0)的百分比变化之间的相关性。在RLL或LLL组中,这些变量之间没有显着关系。相反,在RUL和LUL组中,这些变量之间存在显着的负相关关系。相关系数对于RUL为r = -0.667,p <0.0001,对于LUL为r = -0.712,p <0.0001。在RUL和LUL组中,术前FEV(1.0)%较高的患者术后FEV(1.0)的不良变化百分比更大。此外,RUL和LUL组中所有13例术前FEV(1.0)%预计<60%的患者术后FEV(1.0)升高。术前FEV(1.0)%为预期值的患者在上肺叶切除术后FEV(1.0)增加的情况下,具有更大的“体积减少效应”。结论:上肺叶切除术可能具有缩小体积的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号