...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome.
【24h】

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome.

机译:危重左主干疾病的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术:安全性,疗效和结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients with critical left main stem (LMS) coronary artery disease can undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery safely and successfully. METHODS: From May 1996 to March 2000 data for patients with critical (> or =50%) LMS stenosis who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCAB) or without (OPCAB) were collected prospectively using the Patient Analysis & Tracking System. A reusable pressure stabilizer, intra-coronary shunts and a single posterior pericardial stitch exposure technique were used in all OPCAB cases. Non-randomized, retrospective data analysis included demographic and preoperative risk factors, operative details, clinical outcome and early follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period 387 patients with LMS stenosis underwent surgery (OPCAB n=75, CCAB n=312). Groups were similar in terms of preoperative and intraoperative variables although CCAB patients received significantly more grafts per patient (3.1+/-0.73 vs. 2.6+/-0.76, P< or =0.001). Mortality was similar in both groups (OPCAB 1.3% vs. CCAB 2.6%). OPCAB patients when compared to CCAB patients had a lower requirement for postoperative inotropes (12.0% vs. 38.1%, P=0.0001), temporary postoperative pacing (2.7% vs. 10.1%, P=0.02), and blood product transfusion (6.7% vs. 31.4%, P<0.0001), a lower incidence of postoperative chest infection (0% vs. 6.7%, P=0.02) and a slightly reduced postoperative length of stay (7.9+/-5.46 vs. 8.3+/-5.11 days, P=0.01). At 24 months follow-up, CCAB and OPCAB actuarial survival was 94.1+/-1.7% and 97.7+/-2.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB surgery is safe and effective in patients with critical LMS disease.
机译:目的:确定患有严重左主干(LMS)冠状动脉疾病的患者是否可以安全,成功地进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(OPCAB)。方法:从1996年5月至2000年3月,使用患者分析和追踪系统前瞻性收集了严重LMS狭窄(>或= 50%)行常规冠状动脉搭桥术并进行体外循环(CCAB)或不进行(OPCAB)的LMS狭窄患者的数据。 。所有OPCAB病例均使用可重复使用的压力稳定器,冠状动脉内分流术和单次后心包缝合暴露技术。非随机回顾性数据分析包括人口统计学和术前危险因素,手术细节,临床结局和早期随访。结果:在研究期间,对387例LMS狭窄患者进行了手术(OPCAB n = 75,CCAB n = 312)。尽管CCAB患者接受的移植物明显多于每例患者,但术前和术中变量的分组相似(3.1 +/- 0.73比2.6 +/- 0.76,P <或= 0.001)。两组的死亡率相似(OPCAB为1.3%,CCAB为2.6%)。与CCAB患者相比,OPCAB患者对术后肌力的要求较低(12.0%对38.1%,P = 0.0001),术后临时起搏(2.7%对10.1%,P = 0.02)和输血(6.7%)较低vs. 31.4%,P <0.0001),术后胸部感染发生率较低(0%vs. 6.7%,P = 0.02),术后住院时间略有减少(7.9 +/- 5.46 vs. 8.3 +/- 5.11)天,P = 0.01)。在24个月的随访中,CCAB和OPCAB的精算生存率分别为94.1 +/- 1.7%和97.7 +/- 2.3%。结论:OPCAB手术对于重症LMS病患者是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号