首页> 外文期刊>Educational studies in mathematics >Subjectivity and cultural adjustment in mathematics education: a response to Wolff-Michael Roth
【24h】

Subjectivity and cultural adjustment in mathematics education: a response to Wolff-Michael Roth

机译:数学教育中的主体性与文化调整:对沃尔夫·迈克尔·罗斯的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this volume, Wolff-Michael Roth provides a critical but partial reading of Tony Brown’s book Mathematics Education and Subjectivity. The reading contrasts Brown’s approach with Roth’s own conception of subjectivity as derived from the work of Vygotsky, in which Roth aims to “reunite” psychology and sociology. Brown’s book, however, focuses on how discourses in mathematics education shape subjective action within a Lacanian model that circumnavigates both “psychology” and “sociology”. From that platform, this paper responds to Roth through problematising the idea of the individual as a subjective entity in relation to the two perspectives, with some consideration of corporeality and of how the Symbolic encounters the Real. The paper argues for a Lacanian conception of subjectivity for mathematics education comprising a response to a social demand borne of an everchanging symbolic order that defines our constitution and our space for action. The paper concludes by considering an attitude to the production of research objects in mathematics education research that resists the normalisation of assumptions as to how humans encounter mathematics.
机译:在本卷中,沃尔夫·迈克尔·罗斯(Wolff-Michael Roth)对托尼·布朗(Tony Brown)的《数学教育与主体性》一书进行了批判但部分的阅读。这本书将布朗的方法与罗斯自己的主观性概念进行了对比,后者是从维果茨基的作品中衍生出来的,在罗斯伯格中,罗斯旨在“重新统一”心理学和社会学。布朗的书着眼于数学教育中的话语如何在绕过“心理学”和“社会学”的拉康主义模型中塑造主观行动。在这个平台上,本文对罗斯提出了回应,通过对个人作为一种主观实体的观点进行了质疑,这是相对于两种观点而言的,同时考虑了物质性以及符号如何与现实相遇。本文提出了拉康式的数学教育主体性概念,其中包括对社会需求的回应,这种社会需求承载着不断变化的象征性秩序,这种秩序定义了我们的宪法和行动空间。本文通过考虑在数学教育研究中对待研究对象产生的态度来结束,这种态度反对人们对数学的认识假设的规范化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号