...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management >Entry barriers and industry rivalry Do they mediate the relationship between quality management practices and performance?
【24h】

Entry barriers and industry rivalry Do they mediate the relationship between quality management practices and performance?

机译:进入壁垒和行业竞争是否会调解质量管理实践与绩效之间的关系?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose-This study aims to investigate the impact of quality management practices on performance and the extent to which industry rivalry and entry barriers moderate the relationship between the implementation of quality management practices and quality management performance. Design/methodology/approach-A survey questionnaire was administered for this research using Powell's quality management framework. The respondents were required to indicate their degree of implementation of quality management practices and to rate their TQM performance in relation to overall performance, the firm's competitive position and the nature of the impact of quality management on the organisation. Structural equation modelling was used to test the hypotheses. Findings-The results show that firms with high levels of executive commitment to quality management and those that pay close attention to customer needs tend to improve their competitive position, view quality as being positive for the organisation, and improve overall performance. The results suggest that the degree of quality management implementation is positively associated with entry barriers, which would mean reduced level of threat from new entrants; whereas the industry rivalry issues were not significantly associated with either quality management or organisational performance. The findings also show that existing firms' ability to create entry barriers facilitates increased opportunities to improve their organisational performance.Research limitations/implications - The sample was relatively small, subjective measures of organisational performance were used which may be biased due to respondents' interpretation of their own firm's performances, and there is a possibility that many firms with low levels of QM implementation may not have participated in the study, leading to self-selection bias. These factors may limit the generalisability of the research findings to other settings. Therefore further research is required to ascertain whether the same practices are evident across organisations of different sizes and industry groups within a broader sampling frame.Practical implications - The findings suggest that quality management implementation by firms within an environment where higher levels of entry barriers exist results in higher organisational performance due to the firms' relative protection against new competitors.Originality/value - This is one of the very few papers to investigate the role of Porter's industry analysis framework in relation to quality management implementation and firm performance.
机译:目的-本研究旨在调查质量管理实践对绩效的影响以及行业竞争和进入壁垒在多大程度上缓解了质量管理实践的实施与质量管理绩效之间的关系。设计/方法/方法-使用Powell的质量管理框架对本研究进行了调查问卷。要求受访者表明他们对质量管理实践的实施程度,并相对于总体绩效,公司的竞争地位以及质量管理对组织的影响的性质来评估其TQM绩效。使用结构方程建模来检验假设。结果-结果表明,对质量管理具有高水平执行承诺的公司以及密切关注客户需求的公司往往会提高其竞争地位,将质量视为对组织有利,并提高整体绩效。结果表明,质量管理实施的程度与进入壁垒正相关,这意味着新进入者的威胁程度降低;而行业竞争问题与质量管理或组织绩效没有显着关联。调查结果/结果还表明,现有公司创造进入壁垒的能力有助于增加机会来改善其组织绩效。他们自己公司的业绩,并且有可能许多QM实施水平较低的公司可能没有参加该研究,从而导致自我选择偏见。这些因素可能会限制研究结果的推广性。因此,需要进行进一步的研究,以确定在更广泛的抽样范围内,不同规模和行业集团的组织之间是否存在相同的实践。实际意义-研究结果表明,在存在更高准入门槛的环境中,公司实施质量管理的结果原产/价值-这是研究Porter的行业分析框架在质量管理实施和公司绩效方面的作用的极少数论文之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号