首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Dose escalation and quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: long-term results of the Dutch randomized dose-escalation trial (CKTO 96-10 trial).
【24h】

Dose escalation and quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: long-term results of the Dutch randomized dose-escalation trial (CKTO 96-10 trial).

机译:放疗治疗的局部前列腺癌患者的剂量升高和生活质量:荷兰随机剂量升高试验(CKTO 96-10试验)的长期结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of dose escalation of radiotherapy on quality of life (QoL) in prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred prostate cancer patients participating in the Dutch randomized trial (CKTO 69-10) comparing 68 Gy with 78 Gy were the subject of this analysis. These patients filled out the SF-36 QoL questionnaire before radiotherapy (baseline) and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months thereafter. Changes in QoL over time of >/=10 points were considered clinically relevant. Repeated-measures regression analyses were applied to estimate and test the QoL changes over time, the differences between the two arms, and for association with a number of covariates. RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up, the summary score physical health was 73.2 for the 68-Gy arm vs. 71.6 for the 78-Gy arm (p = 0.81), and the summary score mental health was 76.7 for the 68-Gy arm vs. 76.1 for the 78-Gy arm (p = 0.97). Statistically significant (p < 0.01) deterioration in QoL scores over time was registered in both arms in six scales. The deterioration over time was more pronounced in the high-dose arm for most scales. However, clinically relevant deterioration (>10 points) was seen for only two scales. None of the tested covariates were significantly correlated with QoL scores. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation did not result in significant deterioration of QoL in prostate cancer patients. In both randomization arms, statistically significant decreases in QoL scores over time were seen in six scales. The deterioration of QoL was more pronounced in the physical than in the mental health domain and in some scales more in the high- than in the low-dose arm, but the differences between arms were not statistically significant.
机译:目的:评估放射治疗剂量递增对前列腺癌患者生活质量(QoL)的影响。患者与方法:300例前列腺癌患者参加了荷兰随机试验(CKTO 69-10),将68 Gy与78 Gy进行了比较。这些患者在放疗之前(基线)以及之后的6、12、24和36个月填写了SF-36 QoL调查表。 QoL随时间变化> / = 10分被认为是临床相关的。应用重复测量回归分析来估计和测试随时间的QoL变化,两个臂之间的差异以及与多个协变量的关联。结果:在3年的随访中,68-Gy组的身体健康总评分为73.2,而78-Gy组的身体健康总评分为71.6(p = 0.81),而68-Gy组的心理健康的总评分为76.7。 Gy臂与78-Gy臂的76.1(p = 0.97)。两组的QoL得分随时间的变化均具有统计学上的显着性(p <0.01)降低。对于大多数秤,高剂量组中随时间的变化更为明显。然而,仅在两个量表上观察到临床相关的恶化(> 10分)。没有一个测试的协变量与QoL得分显着相关。结论:剂量升高并未导致前列腺癌患者的QoL显着下降。在两个随机分组中,随着时间的推移,在六个量表中均观察到了QoL分数随时间的统计学显着下降。 QoL的恶化在身体方面比在精神卫生领域更为明显,在某些方面,高剂量组比低剂量组更为明显,但两组之间的差异在统计学上并不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号