首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Management >Negotiating Language, Meaning and Intention: Strategy Infrastructure as the Outcome of Using a Strategy Tool through Transforming Strategy Objects
【24h】

Negotiating Language, Meaning and Intention: Strategy Infrastructure as the Outcome of Using a Strategy Tool through Transforming Strategy Objects

机译:协商语言,含义和意图:通过转换策略对象使用策略工具的结果是策略基础结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research examines how managers collectively use strategy tools in local contexts. Building on a practice approach, we argue that the situated use of formal strategy tools is a process of negotiation, materially mediated by provisional strategy objects. We conceptualize strategy tools and objects as having three aspects: language, meaning and intention. Managers use strategy tools successfully if they ultimately create an accepted strategy infrastructure; this final strategy object materializes the (maybe partial) agreement across all three aspects. We theoretically define three processes according to the primary focus of negotiation and illustrate them with empirical vignettes: abstraction/specification, contextualization/de-contextualization and distortion/conformation. We propose a process model of the collective use of strategy tools that integrates the three processes of negotiation and the shifting roles of provisional strategy objects, namely boundary, epistemic and activity. This research thus offers three theoretical contributions. First, it contributes to the material turn of strategy theory by providing a unified conceptualization of strategy tools, objects and infrastructure. Second, the model offers a basis for analyzing how macro-level formal strategy tools get collectively adapted at a micro-level through negotiation processes and transformations of strategy objects. Third, our research explains why some strategy tools are used but their outputs are not.
机译:这项研究探讨了管理者如何在本地环境中集体使用策略工具。在实践方法的基础上,我们认为正式战略工具的现场使用是谈判的过程,主要是由临时战略对象介导的。我们将策略工具和对象概念化为三个方面:语言,含义和意图。如果经理最终创建了公认的策略基础架构,则他们将成功使用策略工具;这个最终的战略目标在所有三个方面实现了(也许是部分的)协议。我们根据谈判的主要重点在理论上定义了三个过程,并用经验的方法对它们进行了说明:抽象/规范,上下文化/去上下文化和失真/构象。我们提出了一种集体使用战略工具的过程模型,该模型整合了谈判的三个过程以及临时战略对象(边界,认识论和活动)的角色转变。因此,这项研究提供了三个理论上的贡献。首先,它通过提供战略工具,对象和基础设施的统一概念,为战略理论的实质转变做出了贡献。其次,该模型为分析宏观形式的正式战略工具如何通过谈判过程和战略对象的转换在微观层次上集体适应提供了基础。第三,我们的研究解释了为什么使用某些策略工具却没有使用它们的输出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号