首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cancer =: Journal International du Cancer >Detection of circulating tumor cells as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: comparison of the efficacy of the CellSearch Assay and the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method.
【24h】

Detection of circulating tumor cells as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: comparison of the efficacy of the CellSearch Assay and the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method.

机译:非小细胞肺癌接受根治性手术的患者中循环肿瘤细胞的检测是一种预后因素:CellSearch分析的疗效比较和上皮肿瘤细胞大小的分离。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Comparison of the efficacy of different enrichment methods for detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) before radical surgery is lacking in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Detection and enumeration of CTCs in 210 consecutive patients undergoing radical surgery for NSCLC were evaluated with the CellSearch Assay (CS), using the CellSearch Epithelial Cell Kit, and by the isolation by size of epithelial tumor (ISET) method, using double immunolabeling with anti-cytokeratin and anti-vimentin antibodies. CTCs were detected in 144 of 210 (69%) patients using CS and/or ISET and in 104 of 210 (50%) and 82 of 210 (39%) patients using ISET and CS, respectively. Using ISET, 23 of 210 (11%) patients had vimentin-positive cells with cytological criteria of malignancy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was worse for patients with CTCs compared to patients without CTCs detected by CS alone (p < 0.0001; log rank = 30.59) or by ISET alone (p < 0.0001; log rank = 33.07). The presence of CTCs detected by both CS and ISET correlated even better with shorter DFS at a univariate (p < 0.0001; log rank = 42.15) and multivariate level (HR, 1.235; 95% CI, 1.056-1.482; p < 0.001). CS and ISET are complementary methods for detection of CTCs in preoperative radical surgery for NSCLC. CTC detection in resectable NSCLC patients using CS and/or ISET could be a prognostic biomarker of great interest and may open up new avenues into improved therapeutic strategies for lung carcinoma patients.
机译:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者缺乏在根治性手术之前检测循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的不同富集方法的疗效比较。使用CellSearch上皮细胞试剂盒,CellSearch上皮细胞试剂盒,通过上皮肿瘤大小分离法(ISET),使用双抗免疫标记技术对210例接受NSCLC根治性手术的连续患者进行CTC的检测和计数。 -细胞角蛋白和抗波形蛋白抗体。在使用CS和/或ISET的210名患者中,有144名(69%)患者中检测到CTC,在使用ISET和CS的210名患者中,有104名中(104%)中检测到了104(39%)。使用ISET,210名患者中有23名(11%)的波形蛋白阳性细胞具有恶性细胞学标准。与仅通过CS(p <0.0001; log rank = 30.59)或仅通过ISET(p <0.0001; log rank = 33.07)检测不到的CTC的患者相比,具有CTC的患者的无病生存期(DFS)较差。 CS和ISET检测到的CTC的存在与较短的DFS更好地相关(p <0.0001; log rank = 42.15)和多变量水平(HR,1.235; 95%CI,1.056-1.482; p <0.001)。 CS和ISET是NSCLC术前根治性手术中检测CTC的补充方法。使用CS和/或ISET在可切除的NSCLC患者中进行CTC检测可能是令人感兴趣的预后生物标志物,并可能为肺癌患者改善治疗策略开辟新途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号