首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >The oxygenation variations related to prone positioning during mechanical ventilation: a clinical comparison between ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients.
【24h】

The oxygenation variations related to prone positioning during mechanical ventilation: a clinical comparison between ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients.

机译:与机械通气时俯卧位有关的氧合变化:ARDS和非ARDS低氧血症患者之间的临床比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare, in clinical practice, the oxygenation variations related to prone positioning (PP) during mechanical ventilation in ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study of data on consecutive patients treated with the same protocol in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: From May 1996 to December 1998, 226 PP periods without adjunction of nitric oxide (NO) inhalation and/or almitrine bismesylate infusion, performed in 59 mechanically ventilated hypoxemic patients (arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) ratio <300 mmHg) with no evidence of left ventricular failure, were included in this study. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial blood gas was measured before the PP, at 1 h from the beginning of the PP, at the end of the PP and 1 h after returning to the supine position. RESULTS: We analyzed 136 PP periods in 34 non-ARDS patients (60.2%) and 90 in 25 ARDS patients. The PP was repeated and the duration of the PP periods was: 10.6+/-0.22 h. The PP during the mechanical ventilation appeared to be safe and well tolerated. A PaO2/FIO2 ratio improvement at the end of the PP period, occurred for 196 periods (86.7%) with a mean PaO2/FIO2 ratio increase of +46.4+/-0.03% at the end of the PP periods compared to the baseline supine value. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio variations at 1 h after the start of the PP, at the end of the PP period and at 1 h after the return to supine were not different in ARDS or non-ARDS hypoxemic patients. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio improvement appeared to be more intense and more rapid in ARDS patients. CONCLUSIONS: In about 90% of periods, PP improved the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with ARDS as well as in hypoxemic patients with non-ARDS. Studies are necessary to determine the impact of PP on survival and the mechanical ventilation duration in ARDS or non-ARDS hypoxemic patients.
机译:目的:在临床实践中,比较ARDS和非ARDS低氧血症患者机械通气期间俯卧位(PP)相关的氧合变化。设计与地点:对一家大学医院的重症监护室(ICU)中接受相同方案治疗的连续患者的数据进行前瞻性观察研究。患者:从1996年5月至1998年12月,在59例机械通气性低氧血症患者中进行了226例PP期,无一氧化氮(NO)吸入和/或阿米替林双甲磺酸酯输注(动脉血氧分压/分数吸氧(PaO2 / FIO2)比率< 300毫米汞柱)没有左心室衰竭的证据,包括在这项研究中。测量:在PP前,距PP起点1h,距PP终点和回到仰卧位1h后测量动脉血气。结果:我们分析了34例非ARDS患者的136个PP期(60.2%)和25例ARDS患者的90个PP期。重复PP,并且PP周期的持续时间为:10.6 +/- 0.22h。机械通气期间的PP似乎是安全且耐受性良好的。 PP期末PaO2 / FIO2比改善了196期(86.7%),与基线仰卧位相比,PP期末PaO2 / FIO2比平均增加了+46.4 +/- 0.03%值。在ARDS或非ARDS低氧血症患者中,PP开始后1 h,PP期结束时和仰卧后1 h的PaO2 / FIO2比变化无差异。在ARDS患者中,PaO2 / FIO2比的改善似乎更加强烈和迅速。结论:在大约90%的时期内,PP改善了ARDS患者以及低氧血症非ARDS患者的PaO2 / FIO2比。必须进行研究以确定PP对ARDS或非ARDS低氧血症患者的存活率和机械通气时间的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号