...
首页> 外文期刊>Infants and young children >Entering the Spectrum The Challenge of Early Intervention Law for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
【24h】

Entering the Spectrum The Challenge of Early Intervention Law for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

机译:进入频谱对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的早期干预法的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the past decade, autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have received enormous media attention because of the growing prevalence of ASD. In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevalence estimated that 1 in 88 children has ASD as compared with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 2,000 children 40 years ago. This growing prevalence has bred enormous controversy involving a host of issues in the research, advocacy, and legal arenas. No issue has received more attention in the field than the belief that vaccinations are the cause of the growth in ASD. In all instances, the millions of dollars in research and the more than 5,000 lawsuits have failed to find such a link. This has led the research, advocacy, and fund-raising efforts to appear to be focused on the "cause or cure" of ASD related more to the fight against polio or childhood cancers than at the treatment of a developmental disability. Even with all of this controversy, however, one issue seems to bridge the gap among researchers, parents, advocates, health care and educational professionals, and policy makers—that evidence has demonstrated that early intervention (El; Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act) for infants and toddlers with ASD works and provides the best pathway to address or ameliorate ASD. Although there is a consensus, El, too, is rife with debate reflected in the growing case law. This article explores the legal issues raised for infants and toddlers with ASD and their families struggling to receive appropriate El services. It also discusses a variety of issues that raise legal problems for those children, including eligibility for El services such as the potential impact of the proposed changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders; the nature, frequency, and duration of El services; the payment of those services; and the dilemmas faced by transition from El to preschool special education.
机译:在过去的十年中,由于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的患病率与日俱增,因此受到了媒体的广泛关注。 2011年,疾病控制和患病率中心估计88名儿童中有1名患有ASD,而40年前估计的患病率是2,000名儿童中只有1名。这种日益流行的现象引起了巨大的争议,涉及研究,倡导和法律领域的许多问题。没有人比接种疫苗是导致ASD增长的原因更受关注。在所有情况下,数百万美元的研究和超过5,000宗诉讼都没有找到这样的联系。这导致了研究,倡导和筹款工作似乎集中在ASD的“原因或治愈”上,而ASD的原因更多地是与脊髓灰质炎或儿童期癌症的斗争有关,而不是与发展性残疾的治疗有关。即使存在所有这些争议,但是似乎有一个问题似乎弥合了研究人​​员,父母,拥护者,医疗保健和教育专业人员以及政策制定者之间的鸿沟-证据表明了早期干预(El;残疾人的C部分) 《教育法》中的规定),适用于患有ASD的婴幼儿,并为解决或改善ASD提供了最佳途径。尽管达成了共识,但El也充满了不断增长的判例法所反映的辩论。本文探讨了针对患有自闭症的婴幼儿及其家庭难以获得适当El服务的法律问题。它还讨论了各种各样的问题,这些问题给那些儿童带来了法律问题,包括获得El服务的资格,例如对《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》的拟议变更可能产生的影响; El服务的性质,频率和持续时间;这些服务的付款;以及从El过渡到学前特殊教育所面临的困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号