首页> 外文期刊>Implant dentistry >Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of two bone substitute materials for bone regeneration: an experimental study in sheep.
【24h】

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of two bone substitute materials for bone regeneration: an experimental study in sheep.

机译:两种用于骨再生的骨替代材料的组织学和组织形态计量学评估:在绵羊中的实验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: In the past decade, there has been an increase focus on regeneration approaches as related to periodontics and implant therapies. The main objective of the present study is the evaluation of quality, density, and thickness of the newly formed bone in experimental defects treated with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and bioapatite-collagen. MATERIALS: Fifteen identical cuboidal defects were prepared in the alveolar edentulous mandibular ridges in 10 male sheep. Defects were randomly assigned to be treated either with DBBM, Bioapatite-collagen or remained unfilled as the control group. Defects of these 3 groups were histologically examined after 6 months. RESULTS: The mean percentages of bone regeneration with DBBM, Bioapatite-collagen, and control group were 51.40% +/- 3.57%, 27.66% +/- 4.18%, and 19% +/- 1%, respectively (P < 0.05). Defects filled with Bio-Oss and control defects did not show foreign body reaction, whereas Biostite particles had a reaction in 40% of the specimens. Trabecular thickness and type of new regenerated bone were also significantly different between Bio-Oss and Biostite (P < 0.05) and control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that using of DBBM particles can promote bone regeneration more effectively than Bioapatite-collagen, and both materials were more promising than the control group.
机译:简介:在过去的十年中,人们越来越重视与牙周病和植入疗法相关的再生方法。本研究的主要目的是评估用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)和生物磷灰石胶原蛋白治疗的实验缺陷中新形成的骨的质量,密度和厚度。材料:在10只雄性绵羊的牙槽无牙颌下颌s中准备了十五个相同的立方形缺损。缺陷被随机分配为用DBBM,生物磷灰石胶原蛋白治疗或未填充作为对照组。在6个月后,通过组织学检查这3组的缺陷。结果:DBBM,生物磷灰石胶原蛋白和对照组的骨再生平均百分比分别为51.40%+/- 3.57%,27.66%+/- 4.18%和19%+/- 1%(P <0.05) 。充满Bio-Oss的缺陷和对照缺陷没有显示异物反应,而Biostite颗粒在40%的样品中有反应。 Bio-Oss和Biostite(P <0.05)与对照组(P <0.05)之间的小梁厚度和新再生骨的类型也有显着差异。结论:本研究结果表明,使用DBBM颗粒比使用生物磷灰石胶原能更有效地促进骨再生,并且两种材料都比对照组更有希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号