首页> 外文期刊>Athletic therapy today : >Comparison of a Mobile Technology with the
【24h】

Comparison of a Mobile Technology with the

机译:移动技术与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Context: The most widely used method for postural balance assessment relies on the subjective observations of a test administrator. Accelerometry has been shown to provide a valid and reliable method for assessment of balance, and recent advances in microelectromechanical systems have made the technology available in mobile electronic devices. Objective: To compare a mobile technology application with a commonly used subjective balance assessment. Setting: Biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Twenty-one nonathlete college-aged individuals (7 men, 14 women; mean age 23 ± 3 years) volunteered to participate. Subjects were excluded if they reported any preexisting condition that might affect postural balance. Results: A strong inverse correlation was found between the scores for the two balance assessment methods (r = -.767, p < .01). Conclusions: Advances in technology have provided an attractive means to objectively quantify postural balance with off-the-shelf mobile consumer electronic devices.
机译:背景:姿势平衡评估最广泛使用的方法取决于测试管理员的主观观察。加速度计已被证明可提供一种有效,可靠的平衡评估方法,而微机电系统的最新进展已使该技术可用于移动电子设备。目的:将移动技术应用程序与常用的主观余额评估进行比较。地点:生物力学实验室。参与者:21名非运动员大学年龄的志愿者(7名男性,14名女性;平均年龄23±3岁)自愿参加。如果受试者报告任何可能影响姿势平衡的既往疾病,则将其排除在外。结果:两种平衡评估方法的得分之间存在很强的反相关性(r = -.767,p <.01)。结论:技术的进步为利用现成的移动消费电子设备客观地量化姿势平衡提供了一种有吸引力的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号