首页> 外文期刊>Applied Measurement in Education >Are Inferential Reading Items More Susceptible to Cultural Bias Than Literal Reading Items?
【24h】

Are Inferential Reading Items More Susceptible to Cultural Bias Than Literal Reading Items?

机译:推论性阅读项目比文字性阅读项目更容易受到文化偏见的影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this article is to illustrate a seven-step process for determining whether inferential reading items were more susceptible to cultural bias than literal reading items. The seven-step process was demonstrated using multiple-choice data from the reading portion of a reading/language arts test for fifth and seventh grade Hispanic, Black, and White examinees. The process began at the broadest level of analyzing bundles of items for differential bundle functioning and finished at the narrowest level of analyzing individual items for differential distractor functioning. Some evidence was found to indicate that inferential items are more susceptible to cultural bias than literal items. Implications of the results are discussed, and suggestions for item writers and test developers are given.
机译:本文的目的是说明确定推理阅读项目是否比文字阅读项目更容易受到文化偏见的七个步骤。七步法的证明是使用针对五,七年级西班牙裔,黑人和白人考生的阅读/语言测试的阅读部分中的多项选择数据进行的。该过程始于最广泛的分析物品束以实现差速器束功能的过程,结束于最狭窄的分析单个物品以实现差速器牵张器功能的水平。发现一些证据表明,推论项目比文字项目更容易受到文化偏见的影响。讨论了结果的含义,并为项目编写者和测试开发人员提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号