首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Disproportionate disadvantage of the young: Britain, the Unicef report on child well-being, and political choices
【24h】

Disproportionate disadvantage of the young: Britain, the Unicef report on child well-being, and political choices

机译:青少年的不利处境:英国,联合国儿童基金会关于儿童福祉的报告以及政治选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unicef Innocenti's latest comparative overview of child well-being in rich countries looks like good news for the UK. We have risen up the ranks, now reaching 16th place among 29 countries. This mediocre position is worthy of celebration because Unicef's previous report in 2007 was shocking: our overall position was lowest among 21 rich countries. We shared this lamentable place with the USA. Indeed many newspaper headlines reflected the recent progress, albeit with one or two examples of scepticism about the notion of measuring child well-being. Children's health policy and systems research has not yet proven its worth to all in the health community, which is trained to believe that the randomised controlled trial is the gold standard of evidence. So it is good to see arguments around this new and important research field, still defining new methods and standards, reaching beyond medical journals to the mainstream press.
机译:联合国儿童基金会因诺琴蒂(Unicef Innocenti)对富裕国家儿童福祉的最新比较概述对于英国来说似乎是个好消息。我们已经跻身29个国家/地区的第16位。这种平庸的地位值得庆祝,因为联合国儿童基金会在2007年的上一份报告令人震惊:我们的总体地位在21个富裕国家中最低。我们与美国分享了这个可悲的地方。确实,许多报纸头条都反映了最近的进展,尽管有一个或两个关于衡量儿童福祉概念的怀疑例子。儿童保健政策和系统研究尚未在保健界向所有人证明其价值,训练该保健派认为,该随机对照试验是证据的黄金标准。因此,很高兴看到围绕这个新的重要研究领域的争论,仍然在定义新的方法和标准,范围从医学期刊到主流媒体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号