...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Operative versus nonoperative management of acute achilles tendon ruptures: A quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Operative versus nonoperative management of acute achilles tendon ruptures: A quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials

机译:急性跟腱断裂的手术治疗与非手术治疗:随机对照试验的定量系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Despite several randomized controlled trials comparing operative to nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures, the optimal management of this condition remains the subject of significant debate. Rerupture is a known complication, but most level I studies have not shown a significant difference in the incidence of reruptures when comparing operative to nonoperative management. Purpose: The goal of this systematic review was to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures and to meta-analyze the data with reruptures being the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes including strength, time to return to work, and other complications were analyzed as well. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: We searched multiple online databases to identify English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing open surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures to nonoperative management. Rerupture was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included strength, time to return to work, deep infections, sural nerve sensory disturbances, noncosmetic scar complaints, and deep venous thrombosis. Coleman methodology scores were calculated for each included study. Data were extracted from all qualifying articles and, when appropriate, pooled and meta-analyzed. Results: Seven level I trials involving 677 patients met inclusion criteria. Coleman scores were 95, 95, 95, 89, 78, 97, and 92. Open repair was associated with a significantly lower rerupture rate compared with nonoperative treatment (3.6% vs 8.8%; odds ratio, 0.425; 95% confidence interval, 0.222-0.815). The incidence of deep infections was significantly higher for patients treated with surgery (P = .0113). The incidences of noncosmetic scar complaints and sural nerve sensory disturbances were also significantly higher in patients treated with surgery (P<001 for each). Strength measurements were not standardized and therefore could not be meta-analyzed. Conclusion: Open surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of reruptures when compared with nonoperative management. Several other complications, which are clearly avoided with nonoperative treatment, occur with a significantly higher incidence when surgical repair is performed. The available literature makes it difficult to compare the return of strength in the involved lower extremity after operative or nonoperative management. Future studies may focus on testing strength in a more functional and reproducible manner than isokinetic testing.
机译:背景:尽管有几项比较跟腱断裂手术治疗与非手术治疗的随机对照试验,但对这种情况的最佳治疗仍是一个有争议的话题。复发是一种已知的并发症,但是大多数I级研究在将手术治疗与非手术治疗进行比较时并未显示出复发的显着差异。目的:本系统评价的目的是确定所有比较跟腱断裂手术和非手术治疗的随机对照试验,并对荟萃分析以破裂为主要结果的数据进行荟萃分析。还分析了次要结果,包括力量,恢复工作时间和其他并发症。研究设计:荟萃分析。方法:我们搜索了多个在线数据库,以识别英语的前瞻性随机对照试验,将急性跟腱断裂的开放式手术修复与非手术治疗进行了比较。破裂是我们的主要结果。次要结果包括力量,恢复工作时间,深层感染,腓肠神经感觉障碍,非美容性疤痕主诉和深静脉血栓形成。计算每个纳入研究的科尔曼方法论得分。从所有符合条件的文章中提取数据,并在适当时进行汇总和荟萃分析。结果:涉及677名患者的7项I级试验符合纳入标准。 Coleman评分分别为95、95、95、89、78、97和92。与非手术治疗相比,开放式修补的复发率显着较低(3.6%vs 8.8%;优势比为0.425; 95%置信区间为0.222) -0.815)。接受手术治疗的患者深部感染的发生率明显更高(P = 0.013)。接受手术治疗的患者的非美容性疤痕主诉和腓肠神经感觉障碍的发生率也显着更高(每人P <001)。强度测量未标准化,因此无法进行荟萃分析。结论:与非手术治疗相比,急性跟腱断裂的开放式手术修复可显着降低复发风险。当进行外科手术修复时,非手术治疗显然可以避免的其他几种并发症的发生率要高得多。现有文献难以对手术或非手术治疗后下肢力量的恢复情况进行比较。未来的研究可能集中在以比等速测试更有效和可重复的方式测试强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号