首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore >A comparison of learning strategies, orientations and conceptions of learning of first-year medical students in a traditional and an innovative curriculum.
【24h】

A comparison of learning strategies, orientations and conceptions of learning of first-year medical students in a traditional and an innovative curriculum.

机译:在传统和创新课程中比较一年级医学生的学习策略,学习方向和学习观念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Students adapt their learning strategies, orientations and conceptions to differences in the learning environment. The new curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, which commenced in 2005, puts greater emphasis on student-centred learning. The aim of this study was to compare the learning strategies, orientations and conceptions measured by means of a validated Sri Lankan version of the Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS) at the end of the first academic year for a traditional curriculum student group and a new curriculum student group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Adyayana Rata Prakasha Malawa (ARPM) 130-item Sinhala version of the ILS was administered to students of the traditional curriculum and the new curriculum at the end of their first academic year respectively. Mean scale scores of the 2 groups were compared using independent sample t-test. RESULTS: Students of the new curriculum reported the use of critical processing, concrete processing and memorising and rehearsing strategies significantly more than those in the traditional curriculum group. With respect to learning orientations, personal interest scores were significantly higher for the new curriculum students while reporting of ambiguity was significantly lower among them. CONCLUSION: The results favour the assumption that changes made to the organisation of subject content and instructional and assessment methods have a positive impact on students' use of learning strategies and motivation.
机译:简介:学生可以根据学习环境的差异调整学习策略,方向和概念。斯里兰卡Peradeniya大学的医学院新课程于2005年开始,它更加注重以学生为中心的学习。这项研究的目的是比较传统课程学生群体和新课程的第一学年结束时通过经过验证的斯里兰卡版本的学习风格清单(ILS)衡量的学习策略,方向和概念。课程的学生团体。材料和方法:ILS的Adyayana Rata Prakasha Malawa(ARPM)的Sinhala版本130个项目在第一学年末分别向传统课程和新课程的学生进行管理。使用独立样本t检验比较两组的平均量表得分。结果:新课程的学生报告说,与传统课程组相比,使用批判性处理,具体处理以及记忆和演练策略的人数要多得多。在学习倾向方面,新课程学生的个人兴趣得分明显较高,而其中歧义的报告明显较低。结论:结果支持这样一个假设:对科目内容,教学和评估方法的组织进行的更改对学生使用学习策略和动机有积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号