首页> 外文期刊>Analytica chimica acta >Comparative analysis of volatile compounds of 'fino' sherry wine by rotatory and continuous liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
【24h】

Comparative analysis of volatile compounds of 'fino' sherry wine by rotatory and continuous liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

机译:旋转和连续液-液萃取和固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用对“菲诺”雪利酒中挥发性成分进行比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) methods have been selected and applied to the analysis of volatile compounds in 'fino' sherry wine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.A method based on rotary and continuous liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) for analysis of these same compounds has been optimised.The best conditions to extract this type of compounds using SPME and LLE were determined and both methods were validated.Both methodologies show adequate detection and quantitation limits,and linear ranges for correctly analysing these compounds.The recoveries obtained were close to 100%,with good repeatability values.The analytical and procedural advantages and disadvantages of these two methods have been compared.In general,SPME presented higher sensitivities.Both analytical methods were used to analyse five samples of 'fino' sherry wine supplied by different producers.No significant differences were found between the techniques at a significance level of 5%.The regression coefficients (r~2) for analysis using LLE and SPME exceeded 0.94 for all compounds.The LLE procedure is a method with high repeatability and has the possibility of simultaneous extraction of several samples (up to 12),however the SPME technique is a solvent-free method presenting major advantages,such as small sample volume and higher sensitivity and simplicity.
机译:选择了不同的顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)方法,并将其用于气相色谱-质谱法分析'葡萄酒'雪利酒中的挥发性化合物。基于旋转和连续液-液萃取(LLE)的方法确定了用于分析这些相同化合物的最佳方法。确定了使用SPME和LLE提取此类化合物的最佳条件并验证了这两种方法。这两种方法均显示出足够的检测和定量限,以及可正确分析这些化合物的线性范围。回收率接近100%,具有良好的重复性值。比较了这两种方法的分析和程序优缺点。总体而言,SPME具有更高的灵敏度。两种分析方法均用于分析5种'fino'雪利酒样品由不同生产商提供的葡萄酒,两种技术在显着性水平为5%时未发现显着差异。所有化合物使用LLE和SPME进行分析的抗力系数(r〜2)均超过0.94。LLE方法是一种具有高重复性的方法,可以同时提取多个样品(最多12个),但SPME技术是一种无溶剂方法具有主要优势,例如样品量小,灵敏度高和简便。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号