首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Supervising Anesthesiologists Cannot Be Effectively Compared According to Their Patients' Postanesthesia Care Unit Admission Pain Scores
【24h】

Supervising Anesthesiologists Cannot Be Effectively Compared According to Their Patients' Postanesthesia Care Unit Admission Pain Scores

机译:不能根据患者的麻醉后护理单位住院疼痛评分有效地比较麻醉麻醉医师

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Measurement of postoperative pain scores on arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) is a potential quality metric for supervising anesthesiologists. Our goal in this study was to determine whether rank-ordering by initial PACU numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, as collected by nurses in a nonresearch clinical setting, could be used to compare anesthesiologists after adjusting for confounding factors.METHODS: For a large population of adult patients, the admission PACU NRS pain scores (0-10) were evaluated using proportional odds mixed effects models. Fixed effects included age, gender, race, opioids in the preoperative medication list, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, emergency surgery, laparoscopic approach, outpatient status, anesthesiologist, and PACU nurse; surgeon and surgical procedure were included as random effects. RESULTS: A total of 26,680 initial PACU pain scores were analyzed. The PACU nurse had the largest observed association with initial PACU pain score. Compared with the nurse with the median covariate adjusted NRS score, the odds ratio (OR) for an increased reported pain score ranged from 0.16 (95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.11 to 0.24) to 2.95 (95% Cl 2.43 to 3.59). For anesthesiologists, the ORs for an increase in reported pain ranged from 0.60 (95% Cl 0.37 to 0.99) to 1.44 (95% Cl 0.98 to 2.11). Factors associated with increased pain scores were preoperative opioids, female gender, and ASA physical status 2 and 3. Lower pain scores were associated with outpatient surgery, laparoscopy, African American race, and older patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is little to no evidence to suggest that supervising anesthesiologists can be compared with one another effectively using admission PACU NRS pain scores. The confounding association of the PACU nurse eliciting the admission pain score greatly exceeded the contribution by the anesthesiologist.
机译:背景:到达麻醉后护理单位(PACU)后的术后疼痛评分的测量是监督麻醉师的潜在质量指标。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定在非研究临床环境中由护士收集的最初PACU数值评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分的等级排序是否可用于在校正混杂因素后比较麻醉师。在成年患者中,使用比例赔率混合效应模型评估入院的PACU NRS疼痛评分(0-10)。固定影响包括年龄,性别,种族,术前药物清单中的阿片类药物,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状况分类,急诊手术,腹腔镜手术,门诊状况,麻醉师和PACU护士;作为随机效应,包括外科医生和手术程序。结果:共分析了26,680例初始PACU疼痛评分。观察到的PACU护士与初始PACU疼痛评分的关联最大。与采用中位数协变量调整的NRS评分的护士相比,报告的疼痛评分增加的优势比(OR)为0.16(95%置信区间[Cl] 0.11至0.24)至2.95(95%Cl 2.43至3.59)。对于麻醉师而言,所报告的疼痛增加的OR介于0.60(95%Cl 0.97至2.11)至1.44(95%Cl 0.98至2.11)之间。与疼痛评分增加相关的因素是术前阿片类药物,女性性别以及ASA的身体状况2和3。较低的疼痛评分与门诊手术,腹腔镜检查,非裔美国人种族和老年患者相关。结论:几乎没有证据表明使用入院PACU NRS疼痛评分可以有效地将监督麻醉医师进行相互比较。引起入院疼痛评分的PACU护士令人困惑的联想大大超出了麻醉医师的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号