...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.
【24h】

Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.

机译:两种不同的手套去除方法和距离之间的手污染率和环境污染水平的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health care workers (HCWs) followed two different methods of removing gloves at two distances from the rubbish bin. METHODS: Fifty HCWs performed a personal or causal glove removal method (pretest) and a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-recommended glove removal method (posttest) at distances of 2 feet and 3 feet from the rubbish bin after the application of fluorescent solution (the simulated contaminant) onto their gloved hands. RESULTS: The incidence of the small patch of fluorescent stain (<1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves was significantly lower in the posttest than in the pretest. The incidence of small and large patches (>1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves and on the cover of the rubbish bin was significantly lower at 3 feet than at 2 feet. Health care assistants had significantly higher levels of contamination than other HCWs in the pretest but not in the posttest. There was no significant difference in hand contamination rate between pretest and posttest based on distance from the rubbish bin and type of HCW. CONCLUSION: The impact of the glove removal procedure and the distance to the bin in which used gloves are discarded should be taken into consideration on a daily basis, along with the supervision of infection control measures by minor staff.
机译:背景:手套是防止接触传染病原体传播的必要的预防措施,这些传染病原体是通过直接或间接接触感染者或受污染的环境而传播的。本文报道了一项研究,调查当卫生保健工作者(HCW)沿两种不同的方法从垃圾箱移开两个距离时摘掉手套时的手和环境污染程度。方法:在使用荧光溶液后,距垃圾箱2英尺和3英尺的距离,五十名医护人员进行了个人或因果手套去除方法(预测试)和疾病控制中心(CDC)推荐的手套去除方法(后测试)。 (模拟污染物)戴在手套上。结果:脱脂手套前部小块荧光斑点(<1 cm(2))的发生率在测验后明显低于测验前。在3英尺处,落纱手套的前部和垃圾箱盖上的小块和大块(> 1 cm(2))的发生率显着低于2英尺。在预测试中,卫生保健助理的污染水平明显高于其他HCW,但在后测试中则没有。根据到垃圾桶的距离和HCW的类型,前测和后测之间的手污染率没有显着差异。结论:应每天考虑手套拆卸程序的影响以及到丢弃旧手套的垃圾桶的距离,并由未成年人进行感染控制措施的监督。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号