【24h】

Do we forgive physical aggression in the same way that we forgive psychological aggression?

机译:我们是否以与宽恕心理侵略相同的方式宽恕身体侵略?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study examined variations in the impact of social proximity, apologies, intent to harm, cancellation of consequences, and attitude of others on the willingness to forgive an aggressor as a function of the type of aggression-physical aggression or psychological aggression. The participants were instructed to express their willingness to forgive in two contexts-physical aggression and psychological aggression-which constituted a within-subject factor. Five sets of scenarios corresponding to the five between-subject factors (from social proximity to intent to harm) were used. Participants were 215 adults aged 17-60 years. As hypothesized, the cancellation of the consequences had less impact, and the apologies and the intent to harm had more impact, on the willingness to forgive in the case of physical aggression than in the case of psychological aggression. This result was a robust one; it did not depend on the participant's gender and age. Aggr. Behav. 31:559-570, 2005. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:本研究研究了社会亲近,道歉,伤害意图,后果消除以及他人对原谅侵略者意愿的态度随侵略性,身体侵略性或心理侵害类型的变化。参与者被指示要表达自己在两个方面的宽恕的意愿:身体攻击和心理攻击,这是一个被测对象。使用了与五种主体间因素相对应的五组情景(从社会亲近到意图伤害)。参与者为215位年龄在17-60岁之间的成年人。如假设的那样,在身体上侵略的情况下,取消后果的影响较小,而在道歉和伤害意图方面的影响较心理侵略的影响更大。这一结果是可靠的。它不取决于参与者的性别和年龄。 Aggr。行为。 31:559-570,2005.(c)2005 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号