【24h】

Surgeons and research: talent, training, time, teachers and teams.

机译:外科医生和研究:人才,培训,时间,教师和团队。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue of the American Journal of Transplantation, Englesbe and colleagues report that only 6 (1.8%) of the 373 surgeons completing an ASTS accredited fellowship between 1998 and 2008 successfully competed for a Career Development K-series award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and only 5 individuals (3 of them K-series awardees) subsequently obtained NIH R-series funding (1). As NIH funding is one of the clearest metrics for academic success, the authors raise the valid concern that the number of transplant surgeons establishing rigorous research careers is low, and that this represents a threat to transplantation's capacity for discovery. While the truly successful, NIH-funded, career surgeon-scientist has always been a relatively rare commodity, when the numbers are in the single digits, the word extinction comes to mind, and compels the question, what has brought transplant surgery and other areas of surgery, to this apparent brink?
机译:在本期《美国移植杂志》上,Englesbe及其同事报告说,在1998年至2008年间完成ASTS认证的373名外科医师中,只有6名(1.8%)成功竞争了美国国立卫生研究院的职业发展K系列奖(NIH);随后只有5个人(其中3位是K系列获奖者)随后获得了NIH R系列资助(1)。由于NIH资金是取得学术成就最明确的指标之一,因此作者提出了一个令人担忧的问题,即从事严格研究工作的移植外科医师人数很少,这对移植的发现能力构成了威胁。虽然真正成功的,由NIH资助,职业外科医生的科学家一直是相对稀有的商品,但是当数字为个位数时,就会想到“灭绝”这个词,并提出了一个问题,即移植手术和其他领域带来了什么?手术,到这个明显的边缘?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号