首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Education >Evaluating Interdisciplinary Teaching: Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education
【24h】

Evaluating Interdisciplinary Teaching: Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education

机译:评估跨学科教学:农业科学教育课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Interdisciplinary learning experiences (i.e., experiences which illuminate learning of, and connections among, multiple disciplines) are essential to building a more robust understanding of the interconnections of multiple systems. Having an interdisciplinary understanding positively influences the ability of learners to contribute to solving wicked problems (e.g., soil degradation, climate change), most of which fall within the realm of agriculture, food, and natural resources (AFNR). Therefore, within AFNR Education, preparing learners via interdisciplinary experiences could empower the next generation of problem solvers. The Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) has emerged as a potential method for teaching AFNR and science in aninterdisciplinary way. However, research has yet to evaluate the impact of CASE on teachers' intentions to teach science within curricula. In this study, intentions to teach science were compared between CASE-certified and non-CASE-certified educators via a national survey of 212 randomly sampled teachers, 81 of whom were CASE-certified. Within four of the eight courses evaluated, CASE-certified teachers intended to teach more science than non-CASE-certified teachers, while non-CASE-certified teachers intended to teach more science in the remaining four courses. The findings suggest opportunities to enhance the interdisciplinary structure of CASE curriculum and/or explore alternative models for facilitating interdisciplinary learning within AFNR Education.
机译:跨学科学习经验(即,照亮学习的经验,以及多个学科之间的关系)对于构建对多系统互连的更强大的理解至关重要。跨学科的理解积极影响学习者为解决邪恶问题(例如土壤退化,气候变化)有助于解决邪恶问题的能力,其中大部分都属于农业,食品和自然资源(AFNR)的领域。因此,在AFNR教育中,通过跨学科经验准备学习者可能会使下一代问题求解。农业科学教育课程(案例)被赋予AFNR和科学的潜在方法,以思考方式。然而,研究尚未评估案例对教师在课程中教导科学的意图的影响。在这项研究中,通过全国调查的212名随机采样教师,其中81名案件认证,比较了教学科学的意图。在八个课程中的四个评估,案件认证的教师旨在教授比非病例认证的教师更多的科学,而非案例认证的教师旨在在剩下的四门课程中教授更多科学。调查结果建议加强案件课程跨学科结构和/或探索AFNR教育内部跨学科学习的替代模型的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号