首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology >How Do the Locking Screws Lock? A Micro-CT Study of 3.5-mm Locking Screw Mechanism
【24h】

How Do the Locking Screws Lock? A Micro-CT Study of 3.5-mm Locking Screw Mechanism

机译:锁定螺钉如何锁定? 3.5毫米锁定螺杆机构的微型CT研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective?To quantify the amount of the screw head thread and the plate hole thread connection in two 3.5?mm locking plates: Locking Compression Plate (LCP) and Polyaxial Locking System (PLS). Materials and Methods?A micro - CT scan of a screw head - plate hole connection was performed pre- and post destructive tests. Tests were performed on bone surrogates in a fracture gap model. The 3.5 LCP and 3.5 PLS plates, with 3 perpendicular screws per segment were used in a destructive static test. The 3.5 PLS plates with mono- and polyaxial screws were compared in a cyclic fatigue tests in two orthogonal directions. Pre - and post - test scan datasets were compared. Each dataset was converted into serial images depicting sections cut orthogonally to locking screw axis. The amount of engagement was detected through automated image postprocessing. Results?The mean amount of the thread connection for the LCP was 28.85% before and 18.55% after destructive static test. The mean amount of the connection for the PLS was 16.20% before and 14.55% after destructive static test. When inserted monoaxially, the mean amount of the connection for the PLS screws was 14.4% before and 19.24% after destructive cyclic test. The mean amount of the connection for the polyaxial inserted PLS screws when loaded against plate thickness was 2.99% before and 2.08% after destructive cyclic test. The mean amount of the connection for the polyaxial inserted PLS screws when loaded against plate width was 3.36% before and 3.93% after destructive cyclic test. The 3D visualization of the thread connection showed that the initial interface points between screw head and plate hole are different for both LCP and PLS after the destructive testing. Depending on the type of applied force, there was either loss or increase of the contact. Clinical Relevance?Micro-CT offers news possibilities in locking implant investigation. It might be helpful in better understanding the nature of locking mechanism and prediction of possible mode of failure in different systems.
机译:目的是在两个3.5×mm锁板中量化螺纹螺纹和板孔螺纹连接的量:锁定压缩板(LCP)和多轴锁定系统(PLS)。材料和方法?进行螺钉头板孔连接的微型CT扫描,并进行破坏性测试。在骨折模型中对骨代理进行试验。 3.5 LCP和3.5 PLS板,每段3个垂直螺钉被用于破坏性静态试验。在两个正交方向上的循环疲劳试验中将3.5 PLS板与单轴和多轴螺钉进行比较。比较预先测试的扫描数据集。每个数据集被转换为串行图像,描绘切割正交切割到锁定螺纹轴的部分。通过后处理自动图像检测接合量。结果?在破坏性静态试验后,LCP的螺纹连接的平均数量为28.85%,18.55%。在破坏性静态试验后,PLS的平均连接量为16.20%和14.55%。当插入单轴时,PLS螺钉的连接的平均量为14.4%,在破坏性环状测试后为19.24%。在破坏性循环试验后,在加载压力板厚度时为多轴插入的PLS螺杆连接的平均数量为2.99%和2.08%。在破坏板宽度时,在装载板宽度时,在加载平板宽度时,对多轴插入的PLS螺钉的连接的平均数量为3.36%和3.93%。螺纹连接的3D可视化表明,在破坏性测试之后,螺钉头和板孔之间的初始接口点是LCP和PLS的不同。根据施加的力的类型,接触的损失或增加。临床相关性?Micro-CT为锁定植入物调查提供新闻可能性。更好地理解锁定机构的性质和不同系统中可能失效模式的预测可能会有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号