首页> 外文期刊>AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses >Course of liver fibrosis in HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients depending on the response to hepatitis C therapy
【24h】

Course of liver fibrosis in HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients depending on the response to hepatitis C therapy

机译:HIV丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的肝纤维化进程取决于对丙型肝炎治疗的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To evaluate the course of liver fibrosis, 328 HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients (210 HCV treated and 118 HCV untreated) were followed-up for 38-42 months. Liver fibrosis was assessed by biopsy or elastometry at baseline and by elastometry afterward, in addition to other noninvasive indexes. A combined liver stiffness stage (LSS) was established and evaluated over time. Eighty patients had sustained virological response (SVR) and 130 had treatment failure (TF) after a standard course of peginterferon-ribavirin therapy. LSS decreased significantly in all fibrosis indexes during HCV therapy in treated patients, but the improvement persisted only in those with SVR. At the end of study, median elastometry values suffered variations of -29%, -5.0%, and +15.4% in SVR, TF, and untreated patients, respectively. Likewise, LSS worsened in 2.5%, 33.1%, and 39% of these groups, respectively: [OR (95% CI) 19.3 (4.4-119), p<0.001] for TF vs. SVR; [24.9 (5.6-154), p<0.001] for no therapy vs. SVR; and [1.29 (0.74-2.3), p=0.40] for no therapy vs. TF. LSS improved in 53.8%, 19.2%, and 5.9% of these groups, respectively: [4.88 (2.51-9.53), p<0.001] for SVR vs. TF; 18.4 (7.17-49.4), p<0.001 for SVR vs. no therapy; and 3.78 (1.47-10.1), p=0.003 for TF vs. no therapy. Independent predictive factors of LSS improvement or worsening were as follows: alcohol abuse [OR (95% CI) 0.48 (0.20-0.99), p=0.047] and [2.45 (1.19-5.03), p=0.016], respectively; SVR [27.7 (6.41-168), p<0.001] and [0.15 (0.07-0.31), p<0.001], respectively; and lower baseline CD4 counts [1.92 (1.08-3.45), p=0.026] and [0.31 (0.15-0.63), p=0.001], respectively. SVR was usually associated with regression of noninvasive liver fibrosis markers, whereas TF and HCV-untreated patients experienced poorer outcomes.
机译:为了评估肝纤维化的进程,对328例HIV-丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)合并感染的患者(治疗210例HCV和未治疗118例HCV)进行了38-42个月的随访。除其他非侵入性指标外,还通过基线时的活检或弹性测定以及之后通过弹性测定评估了肝纤维化。建立了合并的肝脏僵硬阶段(LSS)并随时间进行评估。接受标准剂量的聚乙二醇干扰素-利巴韦林治疗后,有80例患者持续病毒学应答(SVR),有130例治疗失败(TF)。在接受治疗的患者中,HCV治疗期间所有纤维化指标中LSS均显着降低,但只有SVR患者才持续改善。在研究结束时,SVR,TF和未经治疗的患者的中位弹性测定值分别发生-29%,-5.0%和+ 15.4%的变化。同样,这些组的LSS分别恶化了2.5%,33.1%和39%:TF与SVR的比较[OR(95%CI)19.3(4.4-119),p <0.001]; [24.9(5.6-154),p <0.001]无治疗vs. SVR;与TF相比,[1.29(0.74-2.3),p = 0.40](无治疗)。这些组的LSS分别改善了53.8%,19.2%和5.9%:SVR与TF分别为[4.88(2.51-9.53),p <0.001]; 18.4(7.17-49.4),SVR与未治疗相比p <0.001;和3.78(1.47-10.1),对于TF与未治疗相比,p = 0.003。 LSS改善或恶化的独立预测因素如下:酗酒[OR(95%CI)0.48(0.20-0.99),p = 0.047]和[2.45(1.19-5.03),p = 0.016]; SVR分别为[27.7(6.41-168),p <0.001]和[0.15(0.07-0.31),p <0.001];和较低的基线CD4计数分别为[1.92(1.08-3.45),p = 0.026]和[0.31(0.15-0.63),p = 0.001]。 SVR通常与无创肝纤维化标志物的消退相关,而未经TF和HCV治疗的患者预后较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号