首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system
【24h】

Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system

机译:大学之间的差距是拓宽吗? 论韩国高等教育体系中研究产出不平等及其测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines whether the inequality between universities is increasing in terms of research output, in the context of the New Public Management (NPM) regime based higher education reform in South Korea. Recent reforms in higher education sectors around the world illustrate a number of characteristics of NPM, with performance-based funding standing out among others. Performance-based funding has brought up several concerns, especially with unintended consequences of the reforms such as a widening gap in the research activities of universities. We provide an exploratory case study of the South Korean higher education system where performance-based funding programs are rampant, using a novel panel dataset comprised of all the general four-year universities (n = 184) in 2009-2015. The descriptive analysis of the temporal trend of research output inequality among universities shows that the answer of whether the gap is widening or not depends greatly on the use of indices of inequality. We report the conflicting results between the 'relative' and 'absolute' inequality index when applied to the dataset. Our findings are followed by the discussion on the measurements of inequality and their axioms regarding the institutional Matthew effect, suggesting more consideration on the nature of the data and the context.
机译:本研究探讨了大学之间的不平等是否在研究产出方面正在增加,在新的公共管理层(NPM)基于韩国的高等教育改革的背景下。世界各地的高等教育部门最近的改革说明了NPM的许多特征,基于绩效的资金在其他资金中脱颖而出。基于绩效的资金带来了几个担忧,特别是由于大学研究活动差距的变化等改革的意外后果。我们提供了一个探索性案例研究,韩国高等教育系统,旨在基于绩效的筹资计划是猖獗的,使用了2009 - 2015年所有普通为期四年大学(N = 184)的小型面板数据集。大学中研究产出不平等的时间趋势的描述性分析表明,差距是否扩大的答案是大大取决于使用不平等的指标。我们在应用于数据集时报告“相对”和“绝对”不等式索引之间的冲突结果。我们的调查结果随后讨论了对不平等的测量和其公理关于制度马尾效应的测量,这表明对数据的性质和背景的思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号