首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Effects of free-range access on production parameters and meat quality, composition and taste in slow-growing broiler chickens
【24h】

Effects of free-range access on production parameters and meat quality, composition and taste in slow-growing broiler chickens

机译:自由放置对缓慢种植肉鸡生产参数和肉质,组成和品味的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Demand for meat from free-range broiler chickens is increasing in several countries. Consumers are motivated by better animal welfare and other product attributes such as quality and taste. However, scientific literature is not unanimous about whether free-range access influences quality, composition, and taste of the meat. Because chickens normally do not use free-range areas optimally, it is possible that provision of more suitable shelter will lead to more pronounced differences between chickens raised indoors and outdoors. In this study, an experiment with 2 production rounds of 600 slow-growing broilers each was performed. In each round, 200 chickens were raised indoors (IN), 200 had free-range access to grassland with artificial shelter (AS), and 200 had free-range access to short-rotation coppice with willow (SRC). Free-range use, feed intake, and growth were monitored, and after slaughter (d72) meat quality, composition, and taste were assessed. Free-range use was higher in SRC than in AS chickens (42.8 vs. 35.1%, P < 0.001). IN chickens were heavier at d70 than AS and SRC chickens (2.79 vs. 2.66 and 2.68 kg, P = 0.005). However, feed intake and conversion did not differ. Breast meat of chickens with free-range access was darker (P = 0.021) and yellower (P = 0.001) than that of IN chickens. Ultimate pH was lower (5.73 vs. 5.79; P = 0.006) and drip loss higher (1.29 vs. 1.09%; P = 0.05) in IN versus AS chickens. The percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids was higher in AS than in IN meat (35.84 vs. 34.59%; P = 0.021). The taste panel judged breast meat of SRC chickens to be more tender (P = 0.003) and less fibrous (P = 0.013) compared to that of AS and IN chickens, and juicier compared to the IN chickens (P = 0.017). Overall, free-range access negatively affected slaughter weight, but positively affected meat quality, taste, and composition. Only a few differences between AS and SRC were found, possibly due to limited differences in free-range use.
机译:从自由放养的肉鸡鸡肉的需求在几个国家越来越大。消费者受到更好的动物福利和其他产品属性,如质量和品味。然而,科学文学不是一致的,无论是游泳道进入是否会影响肉类的质量,组成和味道。因为鸡通常不会最佳地使用自由距离区域,所以有可能提供更合适的庇护所将导致鸡在室内饲养的鸡之间更明显的差异。在这项研究中,进行了2种生产轮的实验,每次生产600个慢速增长的肉鸡。在每一轮中,200鸡在室内升高(in),200次自由放入草地的草地(AS),200人与柳树(SRC)进行了短旋转Coppice的自由放养。监测自由游离使用,进料摄入和生长,并在屠宰(D72)肉质,组成和味道后进行评估。 SRC的自由距离使用较高,而不是鸡(42.8 vs.35.1%,P <0.001)。在D70的鸡中比AS和SRC鸡(2.79对2.66和2.68千克,P = 0.005)更重。但是,进料进口和转换没有差异。具有自由放射性进入的鸡的乳房较暗(p = 0.021)和大喊大叫(p = 0.001)比鸡的乳头。最终pH值较低(5.73 vs.5.79; p = 0.006),滴落损失更高(1.29与1.09%; p = 0.05),与鸡一样。多不饱和脂肪酸的百分比在肉中较高(35.84 vs.34.59%; p = 0.021)。与鸡相比,味道小组判断乳头鸡的乳头鸡的乳头鸡肉类更高(p = 0.003)和少量纤维(p = 0.013)(p = 0.017)。总体而言,自由放射道受到负面影响的屠宰体重,但积极影响肉质,味道和组成。发现和SRC之间只有几个差异,可能是由于自由距离使用的差异有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号