...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroradiology >Airbag deployment and cervical spine injury in restrained drivers following motor vehicle collisions
【24h】

Airbag deployment and cervical spine injury in restrained drivers following motor vehicle collisions

机译:机动车碰撞后,安全气囊部署和颈椎脊柱损伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Seatbelts and airbags are the most important devices protecting drivers from cervical spine injury (CSI) following motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). However, there have been few reports on the radiographic characteristics of CSI sustained by restrained, airbag-deployed drivers. Methods A single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted using prospectively acquired data. Between January 2011 and December 2017, 564 restrained drivers, whose vehicle had been severely damaged in MVCs, underwent whole-body computed tomography for evaluation of bodily injuries. The drivers were dichotomized into airbag (+) group ( n ?=?218) and airbag (?) group ( n ?=?139), after excluding 207 drivers in whom airbag deployment status was unknown. Results Eight and nine drivers sustained CSIs in the airbag (+) and airbag (?) group, respectively. The frequency of CSI did not differ significantly between the two groups (3.7% vs. 6.5%, p ?=?0.31). All eight CSIs in the airbag (+) group were classified as hyperextension injuries, and four of them sustained concomitant spinal cord injuries caused by dislocation. Within the airbag (+) group, the drivers with CSIs were significantly older than those without CSIs (65.2?±?18.5 vs. 44.8?±?18.7?years, p ?=?0.002). Conclusion Although it is without doubt that the combination of seatbelt and airbag reduces the frequency and severity of CSIs following MVCs, the CSIs sustained in restrained, airbag (+) drivers may not always be mild, and elderly drivers may be at an elevated risk of CSI. In addition, the possibility of a causal role of airbags in CSI requires consideration in this population.
机译:目的安全带和安全气囊是在机动车碰撞(MVCS)之后保护脊柱损伤(CSI)的最重要的装置。但是,关于CSI的射线照相特征仍有很少的报告,通过抑制的安全气囊部署的司机持续。方法使用预期获取数据进行单中心,回顾性观察研究。 2011年1月至2017年12月,564名受限制的司机,其车辆在MVCS中受到严重损坏,接受了全身计算断层扫描以评估身体伤害。在排除了207个驱动程序之后,司机与安全气囊(n?= 218)和安全气囊(n?= 318)组成(n?=?139)。结果分别八至九九个司机分别在安全气囊(+)和安全气囊(α)组中持续CSIS。两组之间CSI的频率没有显着差异(3.7%与6.5%,P?= 0.31)。 AirBag(+)组中的所有八个CSIS被归类为过度损伤,其中四个持续伴随着脱位引起的脊髓损伤。在安全气囊(+)组内,具有CSIS的司机比没有CSIS的司机(65.2?±18.5与44.8?±18.7岁,p?= 0.002)。结论虽然毫无疑问,虽然毫无疑问,安全带和安全气囊的组合降低了MVCS后CSIS的频率和严重程度,但CSIS在受限制的安全气囊(+)司机中可能并不总是温和的,并且老年司机可能处于升高的风险CSI。此外,CSI中安全气囊的因果作用的可能性需要考虑该人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号